Powers J S, Burger M C
Public Health Rep. 1987 Jul-Aug;102(4):444-9.
National Hospice Study data for 1981-82 were used to predict the location of care for terminal cancer patients. Sites of care were conventional care in hospitals, hospital-based hospice care, and hospice care in the home. Subjects were terminal cancer patients with a prognosis of less than 6 months of life who were attended by a primary concerned person. There were 1,732 patients 18-99 years old-293 conventional care, 612 hospital-based hospice care, and 827 hospice home care patients. Data sources were the patient, the primary concerned person, the family, and the medical record. Data were obtained at initial interview for the study, 1-week followup, reassessment every 2 weeks, and bereavement interviews. Information was grouped in the following categories: patient functional status, patient psychological outlook, symptomatology, medical condition, and characteristics of the primary concerned person and family. Conclusions were reached by univariate and multivariate analysis. First, a progression of functional disability was found to exist among care sites, from hospice home care for the least disabled to hospital-based hospice care to conventional care for patients with the greatest disabilities. The location of care was best explained by the patient's functional capacity. Second, the location of care was found to be poorly explained by extent of organ involvement or specific symptoms. Third, the primary concerned persons of patients under hospice home care experienced more stress but reacted no differently when compared with primary concerned persons at other care sites. Fourth, patients under hospice home care survived the longest and reported greater family closeness than other care groups.
1981 - 1982年的国家临终关怀研究数据被用于预测晚期癌症患者的护理地点。护理地点包括医院的常规护理、基于医院的临终关怀护理以及居家临终关怀护理。研究对象为预期寿命不足6个月的晚期癌症患者,且有一位主要关怀者陪伴。共有1732名年龄在18 - 99岁之间的患者——293名接受常规护理,612名接受基于医院的临终关怀护理,827名接受居家临终关怀护理。数据来源为患者、主要关怀者、家属以及病历。数据在研究初始访谈、1周随访、每2周的重新评估以及丧亲访谈时获取。信息分为以下几类:患者功能状态、患者心理状况、症状、医疗状况以及主要关怀者和家属的特征。通过单变量和多变量分析得出结论。首先,发现不同护理地点之间存在功能残疾程度的递进关系,从残疾程度最轻的居家临终关怀护理,到基于医院的临终关怀护理,再到残疾程度最重的患者接受的常规护理。护理地点最好由患者的功能能力来解释。其次,发现护理地点与器官受累程度或特定症状之间的关联不大。第三,居家临终关怀护理患者的主要关怀者经历的压力更大,但与其他护理地点的主要关怀者相比,反应并无差异。第四,居家临终关怀护理的患者存活时间最长,且报告的家庭亲密程度高于其他护理组。