• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众可获取除颤与伴有可除颤节律的目击院外心脏骤停后结局的关联。

The association between public access defibrillation and outcome in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm.

机构信息

Department of Food Science, Faculty of Home Economics, Otsuma Women's University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Critical Care Nursing, Kyoto University Graduate School of Human Health Science, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2019 Jul;140:93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.017
PMID:31129227
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is recommended globally that shocks by automated external defibrillators (AEDs) should be delivered immediately when a shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs. However, the actual time-interval from collapse to first shock by public-access AED and its impact on subsequent outcome has not been extensively investigated in real-world settings.

METHODS

OHCA data from 2013 to 2015 were obtained from the All-Japan Utstein Registry. Bystander-witnessed OHCA patients with shockable rhythm who were shocked by public-access AED in public locations were included. The primary endpoint was 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome, and the association between time-interval from collapse to first shock by public-access AED and subsequent outcome was assessed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 28% (2282/8126) of bystander-witnessed OHCA cases with shockable rhythm were shocked by public-access AED in public locations. The proportion of OHCA patients who were shocked by public-access AED within 5 min from collapse was 58% (1323/2282). Among these patients, the proportion of 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome was 62% (815/1317). The proportion significantly decreased with increased time from collapse to shock by public-access AED (48% for 6-10 min, 38% for 11-15 min, 30% for 16-20 min, and 7% for 21-25 min; p-for-trend <0.001), and no patient survived if shock delivery occurred more than 26 min after OHCA.

CONCLUSION

In Japan, earlier shock by public-access AED led to better outcome after bystander-witnessed OHCA with shockable rhythm in public locations. However, the proportion of OHCA patients who received early shock was still low in public locations.

摘要

背景

全球建议在发生可电击性院外心脏骤停 (OHCA) 时,应立即使用自动体外除颤器 (AED) 进行电击。然而,在现实环境中,尚未广泛研究公共接入 AED 从患者倒地到首次电击的实际时间间隔及其对后续结果的影响。

方法

从 2013 年至 2015 年,从全日本 Utstein 注册中心获得 OHCA 数据。纳入在公共场所目击 OHCA 且具有可电击节律并接受公共接入 AED 电击的旁观者见证者 OHCA 患者。主要终点是 1 个月时具有良好神经功能结局的存活率,评估公共接入 AED 从患者倒地到首次电击的时间间隔与后续结果之间的关联。

结果

在研究期间,28%(2282/8126)具有可电击节律的旁观者见证者 OHCA 患者在公共场所接受了公共接入 AED 电击。在 2282 例患者中,从患者倒地到接受公共接入 AED 电击的时间在 5 分钟内的患者比例为 58%(1323/2282)。在这些患者中,1 个月时具有良好神经功能结局的存活率为 62%(815/1317)。随着从患者倒地到接受公共接入 AED 电击的时间延长,1 个月时具有良好神经功能结局的存活率显著降低(6-10 分钟为 48%,11-15 分钟为 38%,16-20 分钟为 30%,21-25 分钟为 7%;趋势检验 p<0.001),如果在 OHCA 后超过 26 分钟才进行电击,则没有患者存活。

结论

在日本,在公共场所具有可电击节律的旁观者见证者 OHCA 患者接受公共接入 AED 早期电击可改善预后。然而,在公共场所接受早期电击的 OHCA 患者比例仍然较低。

相似文献

1
The association between public access defibrillation and outcome in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm.公众可获取除颤与伴有可除颤节律的目击院外心脏骤停后结局的关联。
Resuscitation. 2019 Jul;140:93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Neighborhood characteristics, bystander automated external defibrillator use, and patient outcomes in public out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.社区特征、旁观者自动体外除颤器的使用与院外心脏骤停患者预后的关系。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
Public-access automated external defibrillator pad application and favorable neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in public locations: A prospective population-based propensity score-matched study.公共场所公共接入自动体外除颤器除颤电极片应用与院外心脏骤停后良好神经功能结局:一项基于人群的前瞻性倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 15;299:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.061. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
Bystander automated external defibrillator application in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.旁观者自动体外除颤器在非致颤性院外心脏骤停中的应用。
Resuscitation. 2019 Apr;137:168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
5
Public-access automated external defibrillation and bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation in schools: a nationwide investigation in Japan.公共场所自动体外除颤仪和旁观者启动心肺复苏术在学校的应用:日本全国范围的调查。
Europace. 2019 Mar 1;21(3):451-458. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy261.
6
Public-access defibrillation and neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan: a population-based cohort study.日本院外心脏骤停患者公共除颤与神经功能结局:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Dec 21;394(10216):2255-2262. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32488-2. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
7
Public access defibrillation improved the outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in school-age children: a nationwide, population-based, Utstein registry study in Japan.公共获取除颤提高了日本学龄儿童院外心脏骤停后的结局:一项全国性、基于人群的乌斯藤登记研究。
Europace. 2013 Sep;15(9):1259-66. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut053. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
8
Citizen bystander-patient relationship and 1-month outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin from the All-Japan Utstein Registry: a prospective, nationwide, population-based, observational study.日本全国旁观者-患者关系及院外心搏骤停后 1 个月结局登记研究:一项前瞻性、全国性、基于人群的观察研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 26;9(7):e024715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024715.
9
Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by public location in the public-access defibrillation era.在公众可获取除颤器时代,按公共场所划分的院外心脏骤停结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Apr 22;3(2):e000533. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000533.
10
Public-access AED pad application and outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Osaka, Japan.日本大阪院外心脏骤停的公众可及自动体外除颤器电极片应用情况及结果
Resuscitation. 2016 Sep;106:70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaps in Public Access Defibrillation: Analysis of International Legislation.公众可获取除颤的差距:国际立法分析
JACC Adv. 2025 Feb;4(2):101573. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101573.
2
Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Among Healthcare and Non-healthcare Workers in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Web-Based Questionnaire.日本医护人员和非医护人员对心肺复苏的态度与行为:一项基于网络问卷的横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Dec 25;16(12):e76396. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76396. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Comparative Efficacy of Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adult Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center.
体外心肺复苏与传统心肺复苏对成人院外难治性心脏骤停的疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 15;14(2):513. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020513.
4
The impact of smartphone-dispatched CPR-trained volunteers on OHCA outcomes is influenced by patient age.智能手机调度的经过 CPR 培训的志愿者对 OHCA 结局的影响受到患者年龄的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 29;14(1):29671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81263-8.
5
Iso-lating optimal automated external defibrillator signage: An international survey.确定最佳自动体外除颤器标识:一项国际调查。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Oct 18;20:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100798. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Bystanders' willingness to assist using automated external defibrillators during cardiac arrest.心脏骤停期间旁观者使用自动体外除颤器进行急救的意愿。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 2;10(17):e37316. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37316. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
7
Optimal duration and timing of basic-life-support-only intervention for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停患者单纯基础生命支持的最佳持续时间和时机。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 13;14(1):6071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56487-3.
8
Effects of Dispatcher-Assisted Public-Access Defibrillation Programs on the Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Before-and-After Study.调度员辅助公众获取除颤计划对院外心脏骤停结局的影响:一项前后对照研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e031662. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031662. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
9
The Role of Automated External Defibrillator Use in the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Rate and Outcome: A Systematic Review.自动体外除颤器在院外心脏骤停生存率及预后中的作用:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):e47721. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47721. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Are there socioeconomic disparities in geographic accessibility to community first responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Ireland?在爱尔兰,社区急救人员对院外心脏骤停的地理可达性是否存在社会经济差异?
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Jun 22;19:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101151. eCollection 2022 Sep.