Yang Ze-Long, Zhu Ming-Hua, Han Xiu-Jing, Liu Qiang-Wei, Long Jian-Hai, Wang Chun-Xi
Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of General Surgery, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, China.
Front Oncol. 2019 May 3;9:329. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00329. eCollection 2019.
Our aim was to investigate whether the modified American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system based on the node ratio can further improve the capacity of prognosis assessment for gastric cancer (GC) patients regardless of the number of lymph nodes examined (eLNs). A total of 17,187 GC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. On the basis of a training set of 7,660 GC patients, we built the tumor-node ratio-metastasis (TNrM) staging system, which was then externally validated with a validation set of 9,527 GC patients. For the training set, the C-index value of the TNrM staging system was significantly higher than that of the AJCC 8th TNM staging system to predict survival for GC patients (C-index: 0.688 vs. 0.671, < 0.001). Moreover, the C-index value of the TNrM staging system was significantly higher than that of the 8th TNM staging system to predict survival for GC patients with ≤15 eLNs (C-index: 0.682 vs. 0.673, < 0.001), as well as for GC patients with >15 eLNs (C-index: 0.700 vs. 0.694, < 0.001). Similar results were found in the validation set. The TNrM staging system predicted survival more accurately and discriminatively than the AJCC 8th TNM staging system for GC patients regardless of the number of eLNs.
我们的目的是研究基于淋巴结比率的改良美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统能否进一步提高胃癌(GC)患者预后评估的能力,而不考虑检查的淋巴结数量(eLNs)。监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中总共纳入了17187例GC患者。基于7660例GC患者的训练集,我们构建了肿瘤-淋巴结比率-转移(TNrM)分期系统,然后用9527例GC患者的验证集进行外部验证。对于训练集,TNrM分期系统预测GC患者生存的C指数值显著高于AJCC第8版TNM分期系统(C指数:0.688对0.671,<0.001)。此外,TNrM分期系统预测eLNs≤15的GC患者生存的C指数值显著高于第8版TNM分期系统(C指数:0.682对0.673,<0.001),对于eLNs>15的GC患者也是如此(C指数:0.700对0.694,<0.001)。在验证集中也发现了类似的结果。无论eLNs数量如何,TNrM分期系统对GC患者生存的预测比AJCC第8版TNM分期系统更准确、更具区分性。