Suppr超能文献

美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)胃癌TNM分期系统第7版与第8版生存率差异比较:韩国一家机构对5507例患者的单中心研究

Comparison of the Differences in Survival Rates between the 7th and 8th Editions of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: a Single-Institution Study of 5,507 Patients in Korea.

作者信息

Kim Sung Geun, Seo Ho Seok, Lee Han Hong, Song Kyo Yong, Park Cho Hyun

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastric Cancer. 2017 Sep;17(3):212-219. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e23. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to compare the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manuals on tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging systems and to evaluate whether the 8th edition represents a better refinement of the 7th staging system, when applied for the classification of gastric cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 5,507 gastric cancer patients, who underwent treatment from January 1989 to December 2013 at a single institute, were included. We compared patient survival rates across the disease groups classified according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC TNM staging systems.

RESULTS

Stage migration was observed in 6.4% (n=355) of the patients. Of these, 3.5% (n=192) and 2.9% (n=158) of patients showed a higher stage and lower stage, respectively. According to the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging criteria, the 5-year overall survival rates of the patients with stage IIIB and IIIC showed a significant difference (40.8% vs. 20.2%, P<0.001) whereas no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rates were observed according to the 7th edition criteria (37.6% vs. 33.2%, P=0.381).

CONCLUSIONS

Restaging stage III cancers according to the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM classification criteria improved survival rate discrimination, particularly, in institutes where the stage III patients were not distinctly categorized.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)肿瘤、淋巴结和转移(TNM)分期系统的第7版和第8版手册,并评估第8版在应用于胃癌分类时是否是对第7版分期系统的更好细化。

材料与方法

纳入1989年1月至2013年12月在一家机构接受治疗的5507例胃癌患者。我们比较了根据AJCC TNM分期系统第7版和第8版分类的疾病组患者的生存率。

结果

6.4%(n = 355)的患者出现了分期迁移。其中,分别有3.5%(n = 192)和2.9%(n = 158)的患者分期升高和降低。根据AJCC TNM分期标准第8版,IIIB期和IIIC期患者的5年总生存率有显著差异(40.8%对20.2%,P < 0.001),而根据第7版标准,5年总生存率无显著差异(37.6%对33.2%,P = 0.381)。

结论

根据AJCC TNM分类标准第8版对III期癌症重新分期可提高生存率的区分度,特别是在III期患者未明确分类的机构中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6bb/5620090/7990a5d8e94a/jgc-17-212-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验