• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最小预测距离:在儿童与成人行人之间的避碰策略中应用通用度量标准。

Minimum predicted distance: Applying a common metric to collision avoidance strategies between children and adult walkers.

机构信息

Dept. of Kinesiology & Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Dept. of Kinesiology & Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2019 Jul;72:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.016
PMID:31132592
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Collision avoidance between two walkers involves a mutual adaptation to speed and orientation in order to successfully avoid a collision. Minimum Predicted Distance (MPD) is the distance at which two walkers would collide if their speed and path trajectory were maintained at first sight of one another. MPD has been used to describe the risk of collision and its evolution over time between two adult walkers when on a collision course. Middle-aged children have been shown to have poor perception-action coupling during static and dynamic collision avoidance tasks. Research has yet to examine whether perception-action coupling deficits persist in a dynamic collision avoidance task involving a child and another walker.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can the metric MPD(t) be used to examine collision avoidance strategies between children and adults?

METHODS

Eighteen children (age: 10 ± 1.5 years) and eighteen adults (34 ± 9.6 years) walked along a 12.6 m pathway while avoiding another participant (child or adult). Groups of three children and three adults were recruited per session. Trials were randomized equally such that each adult interacted with another adult 20 times, each child interacted with another child 20 times, and each adult interacted with a child 21 times, for a total of 141 trials. 3D kinematic data of each participant's head was recorded using the Vicon system.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated: (1) MPD(t) can be used to predict future collisions in children, (2) MPD(t) is an absolute measure that is consistently lower when a child is involved compared to two adult walkers, (3) the individual passing second, even when it is a child, contributes more to MPD(t) than the walker passing first.

SIGNIFICANCE

It appears children have developed adult-like strategies during a collision avoidance task involving two walkers. Body anthropometrics should be considered when determining collision avoidance strategies between children and adults.

摘要

背景

两名行人之间的避碰需要相互适应速度和方向,以便成功避免碰撞。最小预测距离(MPD)是指如果两个行人在第一次看到彼此时保持速度和路径轨迹,他们将碰撞的距离。MPD 已被用于描述两个成年行人在碰撞过程中碰撞的风险及其随时间的演变。研究表明,中年儿童在静态和动态避碰任务中感知-动作耦合能力较差。目前还没有研究检验在涉及儿童和另一名行人的动态避碰任务中,感知-动作耦合缺陷是否仍然存在。

研究问题

MPD(t) 能否用于检验儿童和成人之间的避碰策略?

方法

18 名儿童(年龄:10 ± 1.5 岁)和 18 名成人(34 ± 9.6 岁)在 12.6 米的路径上行走,同时避开另一名参与者(儿童或成人)。每次试验中招募 3 名儿童和 3 名成人。试验随机平均分配,每个成人与另一个成人交互 20 次,每个儿童与另一个儿童交互 20 次,每个成人与一个儿童交互 21 次,共 141 次试验。每个参与者头部的 3D 运动学数据使用 Vicon 系统记录。

结果

结果表明:(1)MPD(t) 可用于预测儿童未来的碰撞;(2)MPD(t) 是一个绝对的度量,当涉及到儿童时,它始终比两个成人行人的 MPD(t) 低;(3)第二个通过的人,即使是儿童,对 MPD(t) 的贡献也大于第一个通过的行人。

意义

在涉及两名行人的避碰任务中,儿童似乎已经发展出成人般的策略。在确定儿童和成人之间的避碰策略时,应考虑身体人类学因素。

相似文献

1
Minimum predicted distance: Applying a common metric to collision avoidance strategies between children and adult walkers.最小预测距离:在儿童与成人行人之间的避碰策略中应用通用度量标准。
Gait Posture. 2019 Jul;72:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 22.
2
Minimal predicted distance: a common metric for collision avoidance during pairwise interactions between walkers.最小预测距离:在行人两两相互作用过程中,避免碰撞的常用度量指标。
Gait Posture. 2012 Jul;36(3):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.021. Epub 2012 May 5.
3
Collision avoidance strategies between two athlete walkers: Understanding impaired avoidance behaviours in athletes with a previous concussion.两名竞走运动员之间的避障策略:了解有既往脑震荡运动员的避障行为受损情况。
Gait Posture. 2022 Feb;92:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
4
Collision avoidance behaviours between older adult and young adult walkers.老年人与青年行人之间的避撞行为。
Gait Posture. 2021 Jul;88:210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.033. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
5
Collision avoidance between two walkers: role-dependent strategies.两个步行者之间的避碰:依赖角色的策略。
Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 May 9.
6
Influence of path curvature on collision avoidance behaviour between two walkers.路径曲率对两个行人避碰行为的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jan;239(1):329-340. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05980-y. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Collision Avoidance With Multiple Walkers: Sequential or Simultaneous Interactions?与多个步行者的碰撞避免:顺序交互还是同时交互?
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;9:2354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02354. eCollection 2018.
8
Adjustments of speed and path when avoiding collisions with another pedestrian.与其他行人避免碰撞时速度和路径的调整。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089589. eCollection 2014.
9
Writing while walking: The impact of cognitive-motor multi-tasking on collision avoidance in human locomotion.边走边写:认知-运动多任务对人类行走时避撞的影响。
Hum Mov Sci. 2023 Apr;88:103064. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2023.103064. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
10
Collision avoidance behaviours while young adults avoid a virtual pedestrian approaching on a 45° angle under attentionally demanding conditions.年轻人在注意力高度集中的情况下,避开以 45°角接近的虚拟行人时的避撞行为。
Hum Mov Sci. 2024 Jun;95:103226. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103226. Epub 2024 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying factors that contribute to collision avoidance behaviours while walking in a natural environment.识别在自然环境中行走时有助于避免碰撞行为的因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):3530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88149-3.
2
Effects of lifestyle activity level on anticipatory locomotor adjustments for pedestrian circumvention: an exploratory study.生活方式活动水平对行人规避时预期运动调整的影响:一项探索性研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jan 18;243(2):48. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06980-y.