Meerhoff Laurentius Antonius, Pettré Julien, Lynch Sean Dean, Crétual Armel, Olivier Anne-Hélène
Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, IRISA - UMR 6074, Rennes, France.
Univ Rennes, Inria, M2S - EA 7470, Rennes, France.
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;9:2354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02354. eCollection 2018.
Collision avoidance between multiple walkers, such as pedestrians in a crowd, is based on a reciprocal coupling between the walkers with a continuous loop between perception and action. Such interpersonal coordination has previously been studied in the case of dyadic locomotor interactions. However, when walking through a crowd of people, collision avoidance is not restricted to dyadic interactions. We examined how dyadic avoidance (1 vs. 1) compared to triadic avoidance (1 vs. 2). Additionally, we examined how the dynamics of a passable gap between two walkers affected locomotor interactions. To this end, we manipulated the starting formation of two walkers that formed a potentially pass-able gap for the other walker. We analyzed the interactions in terms of the evolution over time of the Minimal Predicted Distance and the Dynamics of the Gap, which both provide information about what action is afforded (i.e., passing in front/behind and the pass-ability of the gap). Results showed that some triadic interactions invited for sequential interactions, resulting in avoidance strategies comparable with dyadic interactions. However, some formations resulted in simultaneous interactions where the dynamics of the pass-ability of the gap revealed that the coordination strategy emerged over time through the bi-directional interactions between all walkers. Future work should address which circumstances invite for simultaneous and which for sequential interactions between multiple walkers. This study contributed toward understanding how collision is avoided between multiple walkers at the level of the local interactions.
多个步行者之间的碰撞避免,比如人群中的行人,是基于步行者之间的相互耦合,在感知和行动之间存在一个连续的循环。这种人际协调此前已在二元运动交互的情况下进行过研究。然而,当在人群中行走时,碰撞避免并不局限于二元交互。我们研究了二元避让(1对1)与三元避让(1对2)相比的情况。此外,我们还研究了两个步行者之间可通过间隙的动态变化如何影响运动交互。为此,我们操纵了两个步行者的起始队形,这两个步行者为另一个步行者形成了一个潜在的可通过间隙。我们根据最小预测距离随时间的演变以及间隙动态来分析交互情况,这两者都提供了有关可行动作(即从前面/后面通过以及间隙的可通过性)的信息。结果表明,一些三元交互会引发顺序交互,从而产生与二元交互相当的避让策略。然而,一些队形会导致同时交互,其中间隙可通过性的动态变化表明,协调策略是通过所有步行者之间的双向交互随着时间推移而出现的。未来的工作应该探讨哪些情况会引发多个步行者之间的同时交互,哪些情况会引发顺序交互。这项研究有助于理解在局部交互层面上多个步行者之间是如何避免碰撞的。