• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

路径曲率对两个行人避碰行为的影响。

Influence of path curvature on collision avoidance behaviour between two walkers.

机构信息

Univ Rennes, Inria, M2S-EA 7470, 35000, Rennes, France.

Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inria, IRISA-UMR 6074, 35000, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jan;239(1):329-340. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05980-y. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-020-05980-y
PMID:33175191
Abstract

Navigating crowded community spaces requires interactions with pedestrians that follow rectilinear and curvilinear trajectories. In the case of rectilinear trajectories, it has been shown that the perceived action opportunities of the walkers might be afforded based on a future distance of closest approach. However, little is known about collision avoidance behaviours when avoiding walkers that follow curvilinear trajectories. Twenty-two participants were immersed in a virtual environment and avoided a virtual human (VH) that followed either a rectilinear path or a curvilinear path with a 5 m or 10 m radius curve at various distances of closest approach. Compared to a rectilinear path (control condition), the curvilinear path with a 5 m radius yielded more collisions when the VH approached from behind the participant and more inversions when the VH approached from in-front. During each trial, the evolution of the future distance of closest approach showed similarities between rectilinear paths and curvilinear paths with a 10 m radius curve. Overall, with few collisions and few inversions of crossing order, we can conclude that participants were capable of predicting future distance of closest approach of virtual walkers that followed curvilinear trajectories. The task was solved with similar avoidance adaptations to those observed for rectilinear interactions. These findings should inform future endeavors to further understand collision avoidance strategies and the role of-for example-non-constant velocities.

摘要

在拥挤的社区空间中穿行需要与沿着直线和曲线轨迹行走的行人进行交互。在直线轨迹的情况下,已经表明,根据最近接近的未来距离,可能会提供行人的感知动作机会。然而,对于避免遵循曲线轨迹的行人时的避碰行为知之甚少。22 名参与者沉浸在虚拟环境中,并避开了一个跟随直线路径或半径为 5 米或 10 米的曲线的虚拟人(VH),在各种最近接近距离处。与直线路径(对照条件)相比,当 VH 从参与者身后接近时,半径为 5 米的曲线路径会导致更多的碰撞,而当 VH 从前方接近时会导致更多的反转。在每次试验中,未来最近接近距离的演变表明,直线路径和半径为 10 米的曲线路径之间存在相似之处。总体而言,碰撞和交叉顺序反转很少,我们可以得出结论,参与者能够预测跟随曲线轨迹的虚拟行人的未来最近接近距离。该任务通过与直线交互观察到的类似避碰适应来解决。这些发现应该为进一步理解避碰策略以及例如非恒定速度的作用提供信息。

相似文献

1
Influence of path curvature on collision avoidance behaviour between two walkers.路径曲率对两个行人避碰行为的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jan;239(1):329-340. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05980-y. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
2
Collision avoidance behaviours between older adult and young adult walkers.老年人与青年行人之间的避撞行为。
Gait Posture. 2021 Jul;88:210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.033. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Collision avoidance between two walkers: role-dependent strategies.两个步行者之间的避碰:依赖角色的策略。
Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 May 9.
4
Collision avoidance behaviours while young adults avoid a virtual pedestrian approaching on a 45° angle under attentionally demanding conditions.年轻人在注意力高度集中的情况下,避开以 45°角接近的虚拟行人时的避撞行为。
Hum Mov Sci. 2024 Jun;95:103226. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103226. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
Minimum predicted distance: Applying a common metric to collision avoidance strategies between children and adult walkers.最小预测距离:在儿童与成人行人之间的避碰策略中应用通用度量标准。
Gait Posture. 2019 Jul;72:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 22.
6
Exploring the challenges of avoiding collisions with virtual pedestrians using a dual-task paradigm in individuals with chronic moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.探讨在患有慢性中重度创伤性脑损伤的个体中使用双重任务范式避免与虚拟行人碰撞的挑战。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 May 16;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01378-x.
7
Collision Avoidance With Multiple Walkers: Sequential or Simultaneous Interactions?与多个步行者的碰撞避免:顺序交互还是同时交互?
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;9:2354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02354. eCollection 2018.
8
Minimal predicted distance: a common metric for collision avoidance during pairwise interactions between walkers.最小预测距离:在行人两两相互作用过程中,避免碰撞的常用度量指标。
Gait Posture. 2012 Jul;36(3):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.021. Epub 2012 May 5.
9
Guided by gaze: Prioritization strategy when navigating through a virtual crowd can be assessed through gaze activity.受目光引导:在虚拟人群中穿行时的优先级策略可通过目光活动来评估。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Oct;190:248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Adjustments of speed and path when avoiding collisions with another pedestrian.与其他行人避免碰撞时速度和路径的调整。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089589. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Waist rotation angle as indicator of probable human collision-avoidance direction for autonomous mobile robots.腰部旋转角度作为自主移动机器人可能的避人方向指标。
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0323632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323632. eCollection 2025.
2
Gaze behavior during pedestrian interactions in a community environment: a real-world perspective.社区环境中行人互动时的注视行为:一个现实世界的视角。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jul;239(7):2317-2330. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06145-1. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Walking with avatars: Gait-related visual information for following a virtual leader.与虚拟化身同行:跟随虚拟领导者的步态相关视觉信息。
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Aug;66:173-185. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
2
Collision Avoidance With Multiple Walkers: Sequential or Simultaneous Interactions?与多个步行者的碰撞避免:顺序交互还是同时交互?
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;9:2354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02354. eCollection 2018.
3
Influence of gait mode and body orientation on following a walking avatar.步态模式和身体朝向对跟随行走虚拟形象的影响。
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Aug;54:377-387. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
4
Collision Avoidance Behavior between Walkers: Global and Local Motion Cues.行人之间的避碰行为:全局和局部运动线索。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Jul;24(7):2078-2088. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2718514. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Intercepting a moving target: On-line or model-based control?拦截移动目标:在线控制还是基于模型的控制?
J Vis. 2017 May 1;17(5):12. doi: 10.1167/17.5.12.
6
Influence of person- and situation-specific characteristics on collision avoidance behavior in human locomotion.个体和情境特定特征对人类运动中碰撞避免行为的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Sep;42(9):1332-43. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000223. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
7
Filling gaps in visual motion for target capture.填补目标捕获中的视觉运动缺口。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2015 Feb 23;9:13. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00013. eCollection 2015.
8
How visual information influences coordination dynamics when following the leader.跟随领导者时视觉信息如何影响协调动态。
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Oct 17;582:12-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
9
Adjustments of speed and path when avoiding collisions with another pedestrian.与其他行人避免碰撞时速度和路径的调整。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089589. eCollection 2014.