Suppr超能文献

人工耳蜗植入患者中角状电极插入深度与言语感知的关系:系统评价。

Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology.

Department of Radiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2019 Aug;40(7):900-910. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002298.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

By discussing the design, findings, strengths, and weaknesses of available studies investigating the influence of angular insertion depth on speech perception, we intend to summarize the current status of evidence; and using evidence based conclusions, possibly contribute to the determination of the optimal cochlear implant (CI) electrode position.

DATA SOURCES

Our search strategy yielded 10,877 papers. PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to June 1, 2018. Both keywords and free-text terms, related to patient population, predictive factor, and outcome measurements were used. There were no restrictions in languages or year of publication.

STUDY SELECTION

Seven articles were included in this systematic review. Articles eligible for inclusion: (a) investigated cochlear implantation of any CI system in adults with post-lingual onset of deafness and normal cochlear anatomy; (b) investigated the relationship between angular insertion depth and speech perception; (c) measured angular insertion depth on imaging; and (d) measured speech perception at, or beyond 1-year post-activation.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

In included studies; quality was judged low-to-moderate and risk of bias, evaluated using a Quality-in-Prognostic-Studies-tool (QUIPS), was high. Included studies were too heterogeneous to perform meta-analyses, therefore, effect estimates of the individual studies are presented. Six out of seven included studies found no effect of angular insertion depth on speech perception.

CONCLUSION

All included studies are characterized by methodological flaws, and therefore, evidence-based conclusions regarding the influence of angular insertion depth cannot be drawn to date.

摘要

目的

通过讨论现有研究中关于角插入深度对语音感知影响的设计、发现、优势和不足,我们旨在总结现有证据的现状;并使用基于证据的结论,可能有助于确定最佳的人工耳蜗(CI)电极位置。

资料来源

我们的搜索策略产生了 10877 篇论文。截至 2018 年 6 月 1 日,在 PubMed、Ovid EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 上进行了搜索。使用了与患者人群、预测因素和结果测量相关的关键字和自由文本术语。没有语言或出版年份的限制。

研究选择

有 7 篇文章被纳入本系统评价。符合纳入标准的文章:(a)调查了任何成人后天聋和正常耳蜗解剖结构的 CI 系统的耳蜗植入;(b)调查了角插入深度与语音感知之间的关系;(c)在影像学上测量角插入深度;(d)在激活后 1 年或更长时间测量语音感知。

数据提取和综合

在纳入的研究中;使用预后研究质量工具(QUIPS)评估的质量为低到中度,偏倚风险高。纳入的研究差异太大,无法进行荟萃分析,因此,呈现了个别研究的效应估计值。纳入的研究中有 6 项研究发现角插入深度对语音感知没有影响。

结论

所有纳入的研究都存在方法学缺陷,因此,迄今为止,无法得出关于角插入深度影响的循证结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4b/6641467/be97e34bdd40/mao-40-0900-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验