Division of Medical Physics, Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
J Radiat Res. 2019 Oct 23;60(5):595-602. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrz031.
We evaluated the performance of a newly developed three-dimensional (3D) model-based global-to-local registration of multiple organs, by comparing it with a 3D model-based global registration in the prostate region. This study included 220 prostate cancer patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Our registration proceeded sequentially, i.e. global registration including affine and piece-wise affine transformation followed by local registration. As a local registration, Laplacian-based and finite element method-based registration was implemented in Algorithm A and B, respectively. Algorithm C was for global registration alone. The template models for the prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum and bladder were constructed from the first 20 patients, and then three different registrations were performed on these organs for the remaining 200 patients, to assess registration accuracy. The 75th percentile Hausdorff distance was <1 mm in Algorithm A; it was >1 mm in Algorithm B, except for the prostate; and 3.9 mm for the prostate and >7.8 mm for other organs in Algorithm C. The median computation time to complete registration was <101, 30 and 16 s in Algorithms A, B and C, respectively. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences among Algorithms A-C in the Hausdorff distance and computation time. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the difference of Hausdorff distance between Algorithm A and B with Tukey's multiple comparison test. The 3D model-based global-to-local registration, especially that implementing Laplacian-based registration, completed surface registration rapidly and provided sufficient registration accuracy in the prostate region.
我们评估了一种新开发的三维(3D)基于模型的全局到局部多器官配准方法的性能,通过将其与前列腺区域的 3D 基于模型的全局配准进行比较。这项研究包括 220 例接受调强放疗或容积调强弧形治疗的前列腺癌患者。我们的配准顺序进行,即包括仿射和分段仿射变换的全局配准,然后是局部配准。作为局部配准,在算法 A 和 B 中分别实现了基于拉普拉斯和有限元方法的配准。算法 C 仅用于全局配准。前列腺、精囊、直肠和膀胱的模板模型是从前 20 例患者中构建的,然后对其余 200 例患者的这些器官进行了三种不同的配准,以评估配准精度。在算法 A 中,第 75 百分位 Hausdorff 距离<1 毫米;在算法 B 中,除了前列腺,距离>1 毫米;在算法 C 中,前列腺为 3.9 毫米,其他器官为>7.8 毫米。完成注册的中位数计算时间在算法 A、B 和 C 中分别为<101、30 和 16 秒。方差分析表明,在 Hausdorff 距离和计算时间方面,算法 A-C 之间存在显著差异。此外,在 Tukey 多重比较检验中,算法 A 和 B 之间的 Hausdorff 距离差异没有观察到显著差异。基于 3D 模型的全局到局部配准,特别是基于拉普拉斯的配准,能够快速完成表面配准,并在前列腺区域提供足够的配准精度。