Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Schön Clinic Roseneck, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jul;209:185-192. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 May 25.
Despite being recommended for use in clinical trials, the consensus remission criteria were found to leave patients with persisting symptoms, relevant areas of functional impairment and a decreased sense of wellbeing. Therefore, to evaluate the appropriateness of the schizophrenia consensus criteria, a definition of remission based on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) was developed and remitter subgroups were compared.
239 patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder were evaluated regarding their remission status after inpatient treatment. Remission in schizophrenia was defined according to the symptom-severity component of the consensus criteria by Andreasen et al. and a CGI based definition was calculated using sensitivity and specificity using receiver operating curves (asymptomatic remitter). Both remitter groups (schizophrenia consensus versus asymptomatic remitters) were compared regarding different clinical variables at discharge as well as the likelihood to relapse within a 1-year follow-up period. Both schizophrenia remitter subgroups were compared to remitters in major depression as a reference value.
Following the consensus criteria, 63% of the schizophrenia patients were in remission compared to only 18% following the asymptomatic criterion. The schizophrenia consensus remitters were less likely to be concurrent treatment responders (p < 0.0001), had a significantly greater illness severity (p < 0.0001) and less functioning (p = 0.0358) as well as a significantly greater risk to relapse (p = 0.0174) compared to the schizophrenia asymptomatic remitters as well as the depressed remitters.
It should be critically re-evaluated if the currently proposed consensus criteria are adequate to measure what is traditionally understood to be remission.
尽管共识缓解标准被推荐用于临床试验,但研究发现这些标准会使患者持续存在症状、相关功能受损领域以及幸福感下降。因此,为了评估精神分裂症共识标准的适当性,基于临床总体印象量表 (CGI) 开发了缓解的定义,并对缓解亚组进行了比较。
对 239 名患有精神分裂症谱系障碍的患者进行了评估,以确定他们在住院治疗后的缓解状态。根据 Andreasen 等人的共识标准的症状严重程度组成部分和使用接收者操作曲线计算的 CGI 定义(无症状缓解者)来定义精神分裂症的缓解。使用灵敏度和特异性,将符合共识标准的缓解者组(精神分裂症共识缓解者)与无症状缓解者进行比较,以评估出院时的不同临床变量以及在 1 年随访期间复发的可能性。将这两个精神分裂症缓解亚组与作为参考值的重度抑郁症缓解者进行比较。
根据共识标准,63%的精神分裂症患者处于缓解状态,而根据无症状标准,只有 18%的患者处于缓解状态。精神分裂症共识缓解者不太可能同时是治疗反应者(p<0.0001),其疾病严重程度显著更高(p<0.0001),功能更差(p=0.0358),复发风险显著更高(p=0.0174),与精神分裂症无症状缓解者和抑郁缓解者相比。
目前提出的共识标准是否足以衡量传统意义上的缓解,应该进行批判性地重新评估。