Department of Neurology, Yale Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Proximagen, LLC, Plymouth, Minnesota.
Epilepsia. 2019 Sep;60(9):1797-1808. doi: 10.1111/epi.15159. Epub 2019 May 29.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single-dose nasal spray (MDZ-NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs).
This was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390220) with patients age ≥12 years on a stable regimen of antiepileptic drugs. Following an in-clinic test dose phase (TDP), patients entered an outpatient comparative phase (CP) and were randomized (2:1) to receive double-blind MDZ-NS 5 mg or placebo nasal spray, administered by caregivers when they experienced an SC. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success (seizure termination within 10 minutes and no recurrence 10 minutes to 6 hours after trial drug administration). Secondary efficacy end points were proportion of patients with seizure recurrence 10 minutes to 4 hours, and time-to-next seizure >10 minutes after double-blind drug administration. Safety was monitored throughout.
Of 292 patients administered a test dose, 262 patients were randomized, and 201 received double-blind treatment for an SC (n = 134 MDZ-NS, n = 67 placebo, modified intent-to-treat population). A significantly greater proportion of MDZ-NS- than placebo-treated patients achieved treatment success (53.7% vs 34.4%; P = 0.0109). Significantly, fewer MDZ-NS- than placebo-treated patients experienced seizure recurrence (38.1% vs 59.7%; P = 0.0043). Time-to-next seizure analysis showed early separation (within 30 minutes) between MDZ-NS and placebo that was maintained throughout the 24-hour observation period (21% difference at 24 hours; P = 0.0124). Sixteen patients (5.5%) discontinued because of a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the TDP and none during the CP. During the CP, 27.6% and 22.4% of patients in the MDZ-NS and placebo groups, respectively, experienced ≥1 TEAE.
MDZ-NS was superior to placebo in providing rapid, sustained seizure control when administered to patients experiencing an SC in the outpatient setting and was associated with a favorable safety profile.
评估咪达唑仑单剂量鼻腔喷雾剂(MDZ-NS)在门诊治疗癫痫发作群(SCs)患者中的安全性和疗效。
这是一项 III 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390220),纳入了正在使用稳定抗癫痫药物治疗的年龄≥12 岁的患者。在门诊测试剂量阶段(TDP)之后,患者进入门诊比较阶段(CP),并按 2:1 的比例随机分配接受双盲 MDZ-NS 5mg 或安慰剂鼻腔喷雾,由护理人员在患者出现 SC 时给药。主要疗效终点是治疗成功(在 10 分钟内终止发作,且在试验药物给药后 10 分钟至 6 小时内无复发)。次要疗效终点是 10 分钟至 4 小时内有复发的患者比例,以及双盲药物给药后 10 分钟以上的下一次发作时间。整个过程中均监测安全性。
在接受测试剂量的 292 名患者中,有 262 名患者被随机分配,201 名患者接受了 SC 的双盲治疗(n=134 例 MDZ-NS,n=67 例安慰剂,意向治疗人群)。MDZ-NS 治疗组的治疗成功率显著高于安慰剂组(53.7% vs. 34.4%;P=0.0109)。MDZ-NS 治疗组患者的发作复发率显著低于安慰剂组(38.1% vs. 59.7%;P=0.0043)。下一次发作时间分析显示,MDZ-NS 与安慰剂之间在 30 分钟内出现早期分离,并且在 24 小时观察期间一直保持这种分离(24 小时时差异为 21%;P=0.0124)。在 TDP 期间,有 16 名患者(5.5%)因治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)而停药,而在 CP 期间没有患者停药。在 CP 期间,MDZ-NS 组和安慰剂组分别有 27.6%和 22.4%的患者发生了≥1 次 TEAE。
MDZ-NS 在门诊环境中治疗 SC 患者时,能迅速、持续地控制癫痫发作,优于安慰剂,且具有良好的安全性。