Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Division of Oral Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Oral Dis. 2019 Jun;25 Suppl 1:122-140. doi: 10.1111/odi.13053.
To determine the frequency of use of the core outcome domains published by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) in burning mouth syndrome (BMS) randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
This systematic review, conducted as part of the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VII (WWOM VII), was performed by searching the literature for studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database/Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar from January 1994 (when the first BMS definition came out) through October 2017.
A total of 36 RCTs (n = 2,175 study participants) were included and analyzed. The overall reporting of the IMMPACT core and supplemental outcome domains was low even after the publication of the IMMPACT consensus papers in 2003 and 2005 (mean before IMMPACT consensus publication = 2.6 out of 6; mean after IMMPACT publication = 3.8 out of 6). Use of validated assessment tools recommended by the IMMPACT consensus was scarce (1.9 out of 6). None of the RCTs reviewed cited the IMMPACT consensus papers.
The underreporting of IMMPACT outcome domains in BMS RCTs is significant. Raising awareness regarding the existence of standardized outcome domains in chronic pain research is essential to ensure more accurate, comparable, and consistent interpretation of RCT findings that can be clinically translatable.
确定在临床试验方法、测量和疼痛评估倡议 (IMMPACT) 发布的核心结局领域在灼口综合征 (BMS) 随机对照试验 (RCT) 中的使用频率。
这项系统评价是世界口腔医学第七次研讨会 (WWOM VII) 的一部分,通过在 PubMed、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Cochrane 数据库/Cochrane 中心和 Google Scholar 中搜索自 1994 年(BMS 定义首次发布)至 2017 年 10 月发表的研究,进行文献检索。
共纳入 36 项 RCT(n=2175 名研究参与者)并进行了分析。即使在 2003 年和 2005 年发表了 IMMPACT 共识文件后,IMMPACT 核心和补充结局领域的总体报告率仍然很低(发表共识前的平均报告率为 6 分中的 2.6 分;发表共识后的平均报告率为 6 分中的 3.8 分)。很少使用 IMMPACT 共识推荐的经过验证的评估工具(6 分中的 1.9 分)。没有一篇综述性 RCT 引用了 IMMPACT 共识文件。
BMS RCT 中 IMMPACT 结局领域的报告不足情况显著。提高对慢性疼痛研究中标准化结局领域存在的认识,对于确保 RCT 结果更准确、可比和一致的解释至关重要,这有助于临床转化。