Suppr超能文献

一项关于灼口综合征治疗的随机试验的系统评价。

A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome.

作者信息

Kisely Steve, Forbes Malcolm, Sawyer Emily, Black Emma, Lalloo Ratilal

机构信息

School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia; Griffith Health Institute, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Department Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Australia; Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2016 Jul;86:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is characterized by burning of the oral mucosa in the absence of underlying dental or medical causes. The results of previous systematic reviews have generally been equivocal. However, findings for most interventions are based on searches of 5-10years ago. This study therefore updates previous searches of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for pain as assessed by Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, mood, taste and salivary flow.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and Embase up to 2016.

RESULTS

24 RCTs were identified. Meta-analyses were impossible because of wide variations in study method and quality. The commonest interventions were alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) (8 comparisons), capsaicin or an analogue (4 comparisons), clonazepam (3 comparisons) and psychotherapy (2 comparisons). ALA and capsaicin led to significantly greater improvements in VAS (4 studies each), as did clonazepam (all 3 studies), at up to two month follow-up. However, capsaicin led to prominent dyspepsia. Psychotherapy significantly improved outcomes in one study at two and 12month follow-up. Catauma and tongue-protectors also showed promise (one study each). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes except in the one study of tongue protectors.

CONCLUSIONS

At least in some studies and for some outcomes, ALA, clonazepam, capsaicin and psychotherapy may show modest benefit in the first two months. However, these conclusions are limited by generally short follow-up periods, high study variability and low participant numbers. Further RCTs with follow-up of at least 12months are indicated.

摘要

目的

灼口综合征(BMS)的特征是在没有潜在牙齿或医学病因的情况下口腔黏膜出现烧灼感。以往系统评价的结果通常并不明确。然而,大多数干预措施的研究结果是基于5至10年前的检索。因此,本研究更新了以往对随机对照试验(RCT)的检索,以视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛情况。次要结局包括生活质量、情绪、味觉和唾液流量。

方法

检索截至2016年的MEDLINE和Embase数据库。

结果

共识别出24项随机对照试验。由于研究方法和质量差异很大,无法进行荟萃分析。最常见的干预措施是α-硫辛酸(ALA)(8项比较)、辣椒素或类似物(4项比较)、氯硝西泮(3项比较)和心理治疗(2项比较)。在长达两个月的随访中,ALA和辣椒素在VAS方面的改善显著更大(各有4项研究),氯硝西泮也是如此(所有3项研究)。然而,辣椒素会导致明显的消化不良。在一项研究中,心理治疗在2个月和12个月随访时显著改善了结局。卡他莫拉和护舌器也显示出前景(各有1项研究)。除了一项关于护舌器的研究外,在任何次要结局方面均无显著差异。

结论

至少在一些研究中以及对于某些结局,ALA、氯硝西泮、辣椒素和心理治疗在前两个月可能显示出适度益处。然而,这些结论受到随访期普遍较短、研究变异性高和参与者数量少的限制。需要进行至少12个月随访的进一步随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验