Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1522-1529. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05023-5. Epub 2019 May 29.
Treatment by high-opioid prescribing physicians in the emergency department (ED) is associated with higher rates of long-term opioid use among Medicare beneficiaries. However, it is unclear if this result is true in other high-risk populations such as Veterans.
To estimate the effect of exposure to high-opioid prescribing physicians on long-term opioid use for opioid-naïve Veterans.
Observational study using Veterans Health Administration (VA) encounter and prescription data.
Veterans with an index ED visit at any VA facility in 2012 and without opioid prescriptions in the prior 6 months in the VA system ("opioid naïve").
We assigned patients to emergency physicians and categorized physicians into within-hospital quartiles based on their opioid prescribing rates. Our primary outcome was long-term opioid use, defined as 6 months of days supplied in the 12 months subsequent to the ED visit. We compared rates of long-term opioid use among patients treated by high versus low quartile prescribers, adjusting for patient demographic, clinical characteristics, and ED diagnoses.
We identified 57,738 and 86,393 opioid-naïve Veterans managed by 362 and 440 low and high quartile prescribers, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar across groups. ED opioid prescribing rates varied more than threefold between the low and high quartile prescribers within hospitals (6.4% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001). The frequency of long-term opioid use was higher among Veterans treated by high versus low quartile prescribers, though above the threshold for statistical significance (1.39% vs. 1.26%; adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.997-1.24, p = 0.056). In subgroup analyses, there were significant associations for patients with back pain (adjusted OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55, p = 0.04) and for those with a history of depression (adjusted OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.51, p = 0.004).
ED physician opioid prescribing varied by over 300% within facility, with a statistically non-significant increased rate of long-term use among opioid-naïve Veterans exposed to the highest intensity prescribers.
在急诊部(ED)接受高阿片类药物处方治疗的医生与医疗保险受益人的长期阿片类药物使用率较高有关。然而,在退伍军人等其他高危人群中,这一结果是否成立尚不清楚。
评估接触高阿片类药物处方医生对退伍军人中阿片类药物-naive 患者长期使用阿片类药物的影响。
使用退伍军人健康管理局(VA)就诊和处方数据的观察性研究。
2012 年在任何 VA 设施进行索引 ED 就诊且在 VA 系统中过去 6 个月内无阿片类药物处方的退伍军人(“阿片类药物-naive”)。
我们将患者分配给急诊医生,并根据他们的阿片类药物处方率将医生分为医院内四分位组。我们的主要结局是长期使用阿片类药物,定义为 ED 就诊后 12 个月内 6 个月的供应天数。我们比较了由高四分位组和低四分位组医生治疗的患者之间长期使用阿片类药物的比率,同时调整了患者的人口统计学、临床特征和 ED 诊断。
我们确定了 57738 名和 86393 名阿片类药物-naive 退伍军人,分别由 362 名和 440 名低四分位组和高四分位组医生管理。各组患者的特征相似。医院内低四分位组和高四分位组医生的 ED 阿片类药物处方率相差三倍以上(6.4% vs. 20.8%,p<0.001)。与低四分位组医生相比,高四分位组医生治疗的退伍军人长期使用阿片类药物的频率更高,但未达到统计学显著水平(1.39% vs. 1.26%;调整后的 OR 1.11,95%CI 0.997-1.24,p=0.056)。在亚组分析中,对于背痛患者(调整后的 OR 1.25,95%CI 1.01-1.55,p=0.04)和有抑郁史的患者(调整后的 OR 1.28,95%CI 1.08-1.51,p=0.004),存在显著关联。
ED 医生的阿片类药物处方率在机构内差异超过 300%,接触最高强度处方医生的阿片类药物-naive 退伍军人长期使用阿片类药物的比率有统计学上的非显著性增加。