Liu Yi, Li Weina, Tan Changhong, Liu Xi, Wang Xin, Gui Yuejiang, Qin Lu, Deng Fen, Hu Changlin, Chen Lifen
Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chong Qing Medical University, YuZhong, Chong Qing, China.
J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):709-18. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.JNS131711. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD). The globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) are commonly targeted by this procedure. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of DBS in each region.
MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English-language studies published before April 2013.
of studies investigating the efficacy and clinical outcomes of DBS of the GPi and STN for PD were analyzed.
Six eligible trials containing a total of 563 patients were included in the analysis. Deep brain stimulation of the GPi or STN equally improved motor function, measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Section III (UPDRSIII) (motor section, for patients in on- and off-medication phases), within 1 year postsurgery. The change score for the on-medication phase was 0.68 (95% CI - 2.12 to 3.47, p > 0.05; 5 studies, 518 patients) and for the off-medication phase was 1.83 (95% CI - 3.12 to 6.77, p > 0.05; 5 studies, 518 patients). The UPDRS Section II (activities of daily living) scores for patients on medication improved equally in both DBS groups (p = 0.97). STN DBS allowed medication dosages to be reduced more than GPi DBS (95% CI 129.27-316.64, p < 0.00001; 5 studies, 540 patients). Psychiatric symptoms, measured by Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edition scores, showed greater improvement from baseline after GPi DBS than after STN DBS (standardized mean difference -2.28, 95% CI -3.73 to -0.84, p = 0.002; 3 studies, 382 patients).
GPi and STN DBS improve motor function and activities of daily living for PD patients. Differences in therapeutic efficacy for PD were not observed between the 2 procedures. STN DBS allowed greater reduction in medication for patients, whereas GPi DBS provided greater relief from psychiatric symptoms. An understanding of other symptomatic aspects of targeting each region and long-term observations on therapeutic effects are needed.
对于晚期帕金森病(PD)患者,脑深部电刺激术(DBS)是首选的外科手术方法。苍白球内侧部(GPi)和丘脑底核(STN)是该手术常见的靶点。本荟萃分析的目的是比较DBS在每个区域的疗效。
检索MEDLINE/PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Knowledge和Cochrane图书馆,查找2013年4月之前发表的英文研究。
对调查GPi和STN的DBS治疗PD的疗效和临床结果的研究进行了分析。
分析纳入了6项符合条件的试验,共563例患者。通过统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(UPDRSIII)(运动部分,用于评估患者服药期和未服药期)测量,GPi或STN的脑深部电刺激在术后1年内同样改善了运动功能。服药期的变化评分为0.68(95%可信区间-2.12至3.47,p>0.05;5项研究,518例患者),未服药期的变化评分为1.83(95%可信区间-3.12至6.77,p>0.05;5项研究,518例患者)。两个DBS组中,服药患者的UPDRS第二部分(日常生活活动)评分改善程度相同(p=0.97)。与GPi DBS相比,STN DBS使药物剂量减少得更多(95%可信区间129.27-316.64,p<0.00001;5项研究,540例患者)。通过贝克抑郁量表第二版评分测量的精神症状显示,GPi DBS术后较STN DBS术后从基线水平有更大改善(标准化平均差-2.28,95%可信区间-3.73至-0.84,p=0.002;3项研究,382例患者)。
GPi和STN DBS可改善PD患者的运动功能和日常生活活动能力。两种手术方法在治疗PD的疗效上未观察到差异。STN DBS能使患者更多地减少药物用量,而GPi DBS能更好地缓解精神症状。需要了解针对每个区域的其他症状方面以及对治疗效果的长期观察。