• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会与欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭指南比较:美国心脏病学会指南比较。

ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines on Heart Failure: JACC Guideline Comparison.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/HannaGaggin.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 4;73(21):2756-2768. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.478.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.478
PMID:31146820
Abstract

The 2013 (with updates in 2016 and 2017) American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines provide practical evidence-based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of both acute and chronic heart failure (HF). Both guidelines address noninvasive and invasive testing to establish the diagnosis of HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Extensive trial evidence supports the use of guideline-directed medical therapy and device-based therapies for the optimal management of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Specific recommendations are also provided for HF with preserved ejection fraction although the evidence is substantially weaker. Management of medical comorbidities is now addressed in both guidelines. Acute HF and end-stage disease requiring advanced therapies are also discussed. This review compares specific recommendations across the spectrum of HF phenotypes and disease severity, highlights areas where differences exist, and lists consequential studies published since the latest guidelines.

摘要

2013 年(并在 2016 年和 2017 年进行了更新)美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会和 2016 年欧洲心脏病学会指南为急性和慢性心力衰竭(HF)的诊断和治疗提供了实用的循证临床指南。这两个指南都涉及到无创和有创检查,以确定射血分数降低的心力衰竭和射血分数保留的心力衰竭的诊断。大量临床试验证据支持使用指南指导的药物治疗和基于器械的治疗,以优化射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的管理。尽管证据较弱,但也为射血分数保留的心力衰竭提供了具体建议。现在,这两个指南都解决了医疗合并症的管理问题。急性心力衰竭和需要高级治疗的终末期疾病也在讨论中。这篇综述比较了心力衰竭表型和疾病严重程度谱中的具体建议,突出了存在差异的领域,并列出了自最新指南发布以来发表的相关研究。

相似文献

1
ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines on Heart Failure: JACC Guideline Comparison.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会与欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭指南比较:美国心脏病学会指南比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 4;73(21):2756-2768. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.478.
2
2016 ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guideline update - what is new and why is it important?2016 ESC 和 ACC/AHA/HFSA 心力衰竭指南更新——有哪些新内容,为何重要?
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Sep 14;13(10):623-8. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.134.
3
[The new ESC Guidelines for acute and chronic heart failure 2016].[2016年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭新指南]
Herz. 2016 Dec;41(8):655-663. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4496-3.
4
Contemporary American and European Guidelines for Heart Failure Management: JACC: Heart Failure Guideline Comparison.当代美国和欧洲心力衰竭管理指南:JACC:心力衰竭指南比较。
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 May;12(5):810-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.02.020. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Head-to-head comparison between recommendations by the ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guidelines.ESC 和 ACC/AHA/HFSA 心力衰竭指南推荐的头对头比较。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;24(6):916-926. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2542. Epub 2022 May 29.
6
ACC/AHA/HFSA 2022 and ESC 2021 guidelines on heart failure comparison.ACC/AHA/HFSA 2022 与 ESC 2021 心力衰竭指南比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;10(3):1531-1544. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14255. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
7
Drug therapy recommendations from the 2005 ACC/AHA guidelines for treatment of chronic heart failure.2005年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会慢性心力衰竭治疗指南中的药物治疗建议。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Sep;40(9):1607-17. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H059. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
8
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
9
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):1757-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
10
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e895-e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of anemia on the association between red cell distribution width and 1-year mortality in acute heart failure patients.贫血对急性心力衰竭患者红细胞分布宽度与1年死亡率之间关联的影响。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17539447251366798. doi: 10.1177/17539447251366798. Epub 2025 Aug 22.
2
Heart failure medication treatment and prognosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study.心力衰竭药物治疗与预后:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 12;16:1532123. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1532123. eCollection 2025.
3
Effectiveness of sarcopenia screening indicators in predicting death in older patients with chronic heart failure.
肌少症筛查指标对老年慢性心力衰竭患者死亡的预测效能
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06069-3.
4
Effect of proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole) on adverse drug reactions and rational drug use in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.质子泵抑制剂(兰索拉唑)对老年慢性心力衰竭患者药物不良反应及合理用药的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Feb 15;17(2):1290-1301. doi: 10.62347/BZED8420. eCollection 2025.
5
Fluid balance and clinical outcomes in patients with aortic dissection: a retrospective case-control study based on ICU databases.主动脉夹层患者的液体平衡与临床结局:一项基于重症监护病房数据库的回顾性病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 8;15(2):e083933. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083933.
6
Inferior vena cava diameter in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease: a retrospective study.慢性心力衰竭合并慢性肾脏病患者的下腔静脉直径:一项回顾性研究
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jan 15;30(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02264-x.
7
Tumour necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 3-interacting protein 3 overexpression protects against arrhythmogenic remodelling in the heart failure mice.肿瘤坏死因子α诱导蛋白3相互作用蛋白3的过表达可预防心力衰竭小鼠的致心律失常重塑。
Europace. 2024 Dec 26;27(1). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf002.
8
Predictive modeling of preoperative acute heart failure in older adults with hypertension: a dual perspective of SHAP values and interaction analysis.高血压老年患者术前急性心力衰竭的预测模型:SHAP 值和交互分析的双重视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02734-6.
9
Effect of heart rate control with ivabradine on hemodynamic in patients with sepsis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.依伐布雷定控制心率对脓毒症患者血流动力学的影响:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Oct 23;25(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08560-5.
10
A Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Study of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure, Lipid Profile, and Heart Failure Subtypes.一项关于收缩压和舒张压、血脂谱和心力衰竭亚型的多变量孟德尔随机化研究。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;15(9):1126. doi: 10.3390/genes15091126.