• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大龄儿童的中心静脉导管

Central venous catheters in older children.

作者信息

Pokorny W J, Black C T, McGill C W, Splaingard M L, Harrison G M, Harberg F J

出版信息

Am Surg. 1987 Sep;53(9):524-7.

PMID:3115158
Abstract

This report discusses the safety of 89 cuffed, Silastic (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) catheters placed in children between the ages of 1 and 18, a group that may be considered high risk on the basis of age. The overall complication rate was once every 288 days, three times more often than in published results in adults, but less often than in other pediatric series. The sepsis rate of once each 1236 days was almost twice the adult rate. Thirty (35%) of the catheters were used at home, accounting for 85 per cent of the total catheter use. Among this group, the overall complication rate was only once every 815 days, three times less frequent than in comparable adult series. The complication rate due to sepsis was once each 2444 days, the same as noted in adults. Whereas these catheters may be more hazardous overall in this age group, home usage appears to be safer than expected. These catheters are well accepted by this age group and their use, particularly among outpatients, should not be restricted for fear of an unacceptably high complication rate.

摘要

本报告讨论了89根带套囊的硅橡胶(道康宁公司,密歇根州米德兰)导管在1至18岁儿童中的安全性,基于年龄,这一年龄组可能被视为高危群体。总体并发症发生率为每288天一次,比已发表的成人研究结果高出两倍,但低于其他儿科系列研究。败血症发生率为每1236天一次,几乎是成人发生率的两倍。30根(35%)导管用于家庭使用,占导管总使用量的85%。在这一组中,总体并发症发生率仅为每815天一次,比类似的成人系列研究低两倍。败血症导致的并发症发生率为每2444天一次,与成人研究结果相同。虽然这些导管在这个年龄组总体上可能更具危险性,但家庭使用似乎比预期更安全。这些导管在这个年龄组中很受欢迎,不应因担心并发症发生率过高而限制其使用,特别是在门诊患者中。

相似文献

1
Central venous catheters in older children.大龄儿童的中心静脉导管
Am Surg. 1987 Sep;53(9):524-7.
2
One hundred consecutive central venous catheters in children.100例儿童连续中心静脉导管置入术。
Z Kinderchir. 1984 Oct;39(5):332-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1044238.
3
Experience with an indwelling right atrial catheter for home parenteral nutrition.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Jul;151(1):108-10.
4
[Use of peripherally inserted multilumen catheters as an alternative to central venous access].[使用外周插入多腔导管作为中心静脉通路的替代方法]
An Esp Pediatr. 2002 Jul;57(1):18-21.
5
Use of Broviac/Hickman catheter for long-term venous access in pediatric cancer patients.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jun;18(2):143-8.
6
Experience using peripherally inserted central venous catheters for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in children at a community hospital.在一家社区医院,使用外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管对儿童进行门诊胃肠外抗生素治疗的经验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Dec;27(12):1069-72. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31817d32f2.
7
100 patient years' experience with the Broviac silastic catheter for central venous nutrition.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1981 Jan-Feb;5(1):32-6. doi: 10.1177/014860718100500132.
8
Tunneled internal jugular catheters in adult patients: comparison of outcomes in hemodialysis versus infusion catheters.成年患者的带隧道式颈内静脉导管:血液透析导管与输液导管的结局比较
Acta Radiol. 2007 Jul;48(6):613-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850701342104.
9
[Prospective study of complications of central venous catheters].
Infusionsther Klin Ernahr. 1984 Oct;11(5):254-61.
10
Failure of antiseptic bonding to prevent central venous catheter-related infection and sepsis.抗菌粘结未能预防中心静脉导管相关感染和败血症。
Am Surg. 1996 Aug;62(8):641-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Home parenteral nutrition in chronic intestinal failure.慢性肠衰竭的家庭肠外营养
Arch Dis Child. 1992 Jan;67(1):109-14. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.1.109.