Kellum J M, Duma R J, Gorbach S L, Sugerman H J, Haynes B W, Gervin A, Newsome H H
Arch Surg. 1987 Aug;122(8):918-22. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400200068012.
Cefazolin was compared with moxalactam for single-dose prophylaxis against infection in a double-blind, prospective, randomized trial of 90 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Risk factors for infection were present in 65 (72%) of the 90 patients and were evenly distributed. Antibiotic levels in plasma, bile, and tissue measured when the cystic duct was divided were similar for both drugs. Age greater than 65 years but not recent cholecystitis or type of antibiotic was predictive of recovery of bacteria from bile cultures. Wound infections occurred in two patients receiving cefazolin and one patient receiving moxalactam for an overall infection rate of 3%. No toxic reactions to antibiotics, including bleeding disorders, were observed. In conclusion, no significant difference in prophylactic efficacy was detected in this comparison of a first-generation with a third-generation cephalosporin. Because of its lower cost and narrower antimicrobial spectrum, however, cefazolin should remain the agent of choice.
在一项针对90例接受胆囊切除术患者的双盲、前瞻性、随机试验中,对头孢唑林和拉氧头孢单剂量预防感染的效果进行了比较。90例患者中有65例(72%)存在感染危险因素,且分布均匀。在切断胆囊管时测得的血浆、胆汁和组织中的抗生素水平,两种药物相似。年龄大于65岁而非近期胆囊炎或抗生素类型可预测胆汁培养中细菌的检出情况。接受头孢唑林治疗的2例患者和接受拉氧头孢治疗的1例患者发生了伤口感染,总体感染率为3%。未观察到对抗生素的毒性反应,包括出血性疾病。总之,在第一代头孢菌素与第三代头孢菌素的比较中,未检测到预防效果的显著差异。然而,由于其成本较低且抗菌谱较窄,头孢唑林仍应作为首选药物。