Clinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Sep;46(9):908-917. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13157. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
We aimed to assess how the 2018 and 1999 classifications of periodontal diseases reflect (a) patients' characteristics, (b) disease severity/extent/progression and (c) tooth loss (TL) during observation period.
A total of 251 patients were followed over 21.8 ± 6.2 years. For the 1999 classification, using clinical attachment level (CAL), patients were classified as localized/generalized, mild/moderate/severe and aggressive/chronic periodontitis. For the 2018 classification, patients were staged according to their CAL or bone loss (BL) and the number of lost teeth (stages I-IV). Further factors like probing pocket depths (PPD) or furcation involvement modified the stage. The extent was sub-classified as generalized/localized. Patients were graded according to the BL/age index, smoking and/or diabetes.
According to the 1999 classification, most patients suffered from generalized severe chronic periodontitis (203/251) or generalized aggressive periodontitis (45/251). Patients with aggressive periodontitis were younger and less often female or smokers. They showed similar TL (0.25 ± 0.22 teeth/patientyear) as generalized severe chronic periodontitis patients (0.23 ± 0.25 teeth/patientyear). According to the 2018 classification, most patients were classified as generalized III-C (140/251), III-B (31/251) or IV-C (64/251). Patients' age, smoking status, CAL, PPD and BL were well reflected. TL differed between IV-C (0.36 ± 0.47), generalized III-C (0.21 ± 0.24) and localized forms (0.10-0.15).
Patients' characteristics, disease severity/extent/progression and TL were well reflected by the 2018 classification.
我们旨在评估 1999 年和 2018 年牙周病分类法如何反映(a)患者特征,(b)疾病严重程度/程度/进展和(c)观察期间的牙齿缺失(TL)。
共对 251 例患者进行了 21.8±6.2 年的随访。对于 1999 年的分类,使用临床附着水平(CAL),将患者分为局部/广泛、轻度/中度/重度和侵袭性/慢性牙周炎。对于 2018 年的分类,根据 CAL 或骨丢失(BL)和失牙数(I-IV 期)对患者进行分期。进一步的因素,如探测袋深度(PPD)或分叉受累,会修改分期。程度进一步分为广泛/局部。根据 BL/年龄指数、吸烟和/或糖尿病对患者进行分级。
根据 1999 年的分类,大多数患者患有广泛性严重慢性牙周炎(203/251)或广泛性侵袭性牙周炎(45/251)。侵袭性牙周炎患者年龄较小,女性或吸烟者较少。他们的 TL 相似(0.25±0.22 颗/患者年),与广泛性严重慢性牙周炎患者(0.23±0.25 颗/患者年)相似。根据 2018 年的分类,大多数患者被分类为广泛性 III-C(140/251)、III-B(31/251)或 IV-C(64/251)。患者的年龄、吸烟状况、CAL、PPD 和 BL 均得到很好的反映。TL 在 IV-C(0.36±0.47)、广泛性 III-C(0.21±0.24)和局限性形式(0.10-0.15)之间存在差异。
2018 年的分类法很好地反映了患者特征、疾病严重程度/程度/进展和 TL。