Suppr超能文献

2018 年分类法与 1999 年分类法中牙周炎患者分类的比较。

Comparison of periodontitis patients' classification in the 2018 versus 1999 classification.

机构信息

Clinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Sep;46(9):908-917. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13157. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess how the 2018 and 1999 classifications of periodontal diseases reflect (a) patients' characteristics, (b) disease severity/extent/progression and (c) tooth loss (TL) during observation period.

METHODS

A total of 251 patients were followed over 21.8 ± 6.2 years. For the 1999 classification, using clinical attachment level (CAL), patients were classified as localized/generalized, mild/moderate/severe and aggressive/chronic periodontitis. For the 2018 classification, patients were staged according to their CAL or bone loss (BL) and the number of lost teeth (stages I-IV). Further factors like probing pocket depths (PPD) or furcation involvement modified the stage. The extent was sub-classified as generalized/localized. Patients were graded according to the BL/age index, smoking and/or diabetes.

RESULTS

According to the 1999 classification, most patients suffered from generalized severe chronic periodontitis (203/251) or generalized aggressive periodontitis (45/251). Patients with aggressive periodontitis were younger and less often female or smokers. They showed similar TL (0.25 ± 0.22 teeth/patientyear) as generalized severe chronic periodontitis patients (0.23 ± 0.25 teeth/patientyear). According to the 2018 classification, most patients were classified as generalized III-C (140/251), III-B (31/251) or IV-C (64/251). Patients' age, smoking status, CAL, PPD and BL were well reflected. TL differed between IV-C (0.36 ± 0.47), generalized III-C (0.21 ± 0.24) and localized forms (0.10-0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' characteristics, disease severity/extent/progression and TL were well reflected by the 2018 classification.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估 1999 年和 2018 年牙周病分类法如何反映(a)患者特征,(b)疾病严重程度/程度/进展和(c)观察期间的牙齿缺失(TL)。

方法

共对 251 例患者进行了 21.8±6.2 年的随访。对于 1999 年的分类,使用临床附着水平(CAL),将患者分为局部/广泛、轻度/中度/重度和侵袭性/慢性牙周炎。对于 2018 年的分类,根据 CAL 或骨丢失(BL)和失牙数(I-IV 期)对患者进行分期。进一步的因素,如探测袋深度(PPD)或分叉受累,会修改分期。程度进一步分为广泛/局部。根据 BL/年龄指数、吸烟和/或糖尿病对患者进行分级。

结果

根据 1999 年的分类,大多数患者患有广泛性严重慢性牙周炎(203/251)或广泛性侵袭性牙周炎(45/251)。侵袭性牙周炎患者年龄较小,女性或吸烟者较少。他们的 TL 相似(0.25±0.22 颗/患者年),与广泛性严重慢性牙周炎患者(0.23±0.25 颗/患者年)相似。根据 2018 年的分类,大多数患者被分类为广泛性 III-C(140/251)、III-B(31/251)或 IV-C(64/251)。患者的年龄、吸烟状况、CAL、PPD 和 BL 均得到很好的反映。TL 在 IV-C(0.36±0.47)、广泛性 III-C(0.21±0.24)和局限性形式(0.10-0.15)之间存在差异。

结论

2018 年的分类法很好地反映了患者特征、疾病严重程度/程度/进展和 TL。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验