• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价长面型白种巴西中学生的面部美观。

Evaluation of facial esthetics in long-faced white Brazilian middle school students.

机构信息

Sagrado Coração University, Bauru, Brazil.

Orthodontics Department, Sagrado Coração University, Bauru, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jun;155(6):812-818. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.017
PMID:31153501
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine orthodontists' and layperson's perceptions about facial esthetics in a long face pattern sample.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 64 frontal photographs of white Brazilian middle school students (9-15 years old), diagnosed as long faced through morphologic evaluation and confirmed by the facial index. A Likert-type scale was used to determine orthodontists' (22) and laypeople's (22) perceptions about facial esthetics. Chi-square and proportions tests were used for comparison between the examiners regarding the classification in each degree of esthetics, adopting a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

For orthodontists and laypeople, most of the subjects were considered to have acceptable appearance: 36.4% and 40.3%, respectively. Subjects whose appearance was classified as unpleasant constituted one-third of the sample: for orthodontists, 7.8% very unpleasant and 22.9% unpleasant, and 6.7% and 22.2%, respectively, for laypeople. The facial structures most cited as responsible for unpleasantness were the lack of lip sealing followed by incisor exposition. The increase of the lower third of the face for orthodontists and eyes for laypeople were the third most cited unpleasant characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

For the evaluators, two-thirds of the long face sample were considered to have an acceptable, pleasant, or very pleasant appearance. Laypeople's opinions aligned with the orthodontists', that one-third of long-face patients were considered to have an unpleasant appearance.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定正畸医生和非专业人士对面部美学的认知,研究对象为长面型样本。

方法

该样本由 64 张巴西白人中学生(9-15 岁)的正面照片组成,通过形态评估诊断为长面型,并通过面部指数得到确认。采用李克特量表来确定正畸医生(22 人)和非专业人士(22 人)对面部美学的认知。采用卡方检验和比例检验比较不同评估者在每个美学等级的分类,采用 5%的显著性水平。

结果

对于正畸医生和非专业人士,大多数受试者被认为具有可接受的外观:分别为 36.4%和 40.3%。外观被归类为不美观的受试者占样本的三分之一:对于正畸医生,分别有 7.8%非常不美观和 22.9%不美观,而非专业人士则分别为 6.7%和 22.2%。导致不美观的最常见面部结构是唇闭合不足,其次是切牙暴露。对于正畸医生来说,面下部增加,对于非专业人士来说,眼睛是被认为是第三大不美观特征。

结论

对于评估者来说,三分之二的长面型样本被认为具有可接受、美观或非常美观的外观。非专业人士的观点与正畸医生一致,认为三分之一的长面型患者的外观不美观。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of facial esthetics in long-faced white Brazilian middle school students.评价长面型白种巴西中学生的面部美观。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jun;155(6):812-818. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.017.
2
Orthodontists' and laypeople's perception of smile height aesthetics in relation to varying degrees of transverse cant of anterior teeth.正畸医生和外行人对与前牙不同程度横向倾斜相关的微笑高度美学的认知。
Aust Orthod J. 2016 May;32(1):55-63.
3
Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria.根据主观面部分析标准对黑人面部吸引力的评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Feb;22(1):75-81. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.075-081.oar.
4
Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.双侧完全性唇腭裂修复成年患者面部轮廓的美学评价
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan;73(1):169.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
5
Perception of adults' smile esthetics among orthodontists, clinicians and laypeople.正畸医生、临床医生和普通民众对成人微笑美学的认知。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):40-4. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.040-044.oar.
6
Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate.双侧唇腭裂手术患儿的面部轮廓美学
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Jul-Aug;22(4):41-46. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.4.041-046.oar.
7
The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.姿势笑容在整体面部美观中的作用。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):322-8. doi: 10.2319/040409-194.1.
8
Self-perception of facial esthetics by patients with different profiles compared with assessments of orthodontists and lay people.不同面型患者对面部美学的自我认知与正畸医生和外行人评估的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Dec;158(6):840-848. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.027. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.美观与不美观面部轮廓的光度分析。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Mar-Apr;19(2):66-75. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.066-075.oar.
10
Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.牙龈暴露对不同面部形态下 posed 微笑的影响:牙医与患者观念的比较
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):568-73. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107328.

引用本文的文献

1
Vertical Dentofacial Skeletal Divergency Is Not Linked with Oral Health-Related Quality of Life.垂直牙颌面骨骼差异与口腔健康相关生活质量无关。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 24;13(3):665. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030665.