Suppr超能文献

利用双能 CT 衍生的虚拟非对比图像评估胆道结石病:虚拟非对比图像在胆道结石检测方面可以替代真实非对比图像。

Utilization of virtual non-contrast images derived from dual-energy CT in evaluation of biliary stone disease: Virtual non-contrast image can replace true non-contrast image regarding biliary stone detection.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul;116:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the virtual non-contrast (VNC) images acquired through dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) with the true non-contrast (TNC) images in the detection of biliary stones and to calculate dose reduction by replacing TNC images with VNC images.

METHODS

Between March 2017 and April 2018, we retrospectively enrolled 75 patients with suspicious biliary disease who underwent dual-source DECT and surgery and/or endoscopic intervention within 2 months from the CT. Biliary stones were present in 45 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting gallstone and common bile duct (CBD) stone were compared between the VNC and TNC using McNemar test. In addition, the possible reduction in radiation dose was calculated.

RESULTS

In our study, 37 patients had gallstones, 2 had CBD stones, and 6 had both gallstone and CBD stones. For detection of gallstones, the sensitivity and specificity were 90.7% (39/43) and 87.5% (28/32), respectively, for the TNC images, and 88.4% (38/43) and 90.6% (29/32), respectively, for the VNC images. With respect to CBD stones, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% (7/8) and 98.5% (66/67), respectively, for the TNC images, and 75.0% (6/8) and 100% (67/67), respectively, for the VNC images. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity between each image set (P > 0.05). The radiation dose reduction of 22.4 ± 1.3% is expected by omitting TNC images.

CONCLUSIONS

The VNC images derived from DECT were comparable to the TNC images for the detection of biliary stones and may replace the TNC images to reduce radiation dose.

摘要

目的

比较双能 CT(DECT)获得的虚拟非对比(VNC)图像与真实非对比(TNC)图像在胆管结石检测中的差异,并计算用 VNC 图像替代 TNC 图像的剂量减少。

方法

2017 年 3 月至 2018 年 4 月,我们回顾性纳入 75 例疑似胆道疾病患者,这些患者在 CT 检查后 2 个月内行双源 DECT 检查和/或手术及内镜介入治疗。45 例患者存在胆管结石。使用 McNemar 检验比较 VNC 和 TNC 对胆囊结石和胆总管(CBD)结石的检测灵敏度和特异度。此外,还计算了可能减少的辐射剂量。

结果

在我们的研究中,37 例患者有胆囊结石,2 例有 CBD 结石,6 例有胆囊结石和 CBD 结石。对于胆囊结石的检测,TNC 图像的灵敏度和特异度分别为 90.7%(39/43)和 87.5%(28/32),VNC 图像分别为 88.4%(38/43)和 90.6%(29/32)。对于 CBD 结石,TNC 图像的灵敏度和特异度分别为 87.5%(7/8)和 98.5%(66/67),VNC 图像分别为 75.0%(6/8)和 100%(67/67)。两组图像之间的灵敏度和特异度无显著差异(P>0.05)。通过省略 TNC 图像,预计可减少 22.4±1.3%的辐射剂量。

结论

DECT 获得的 VNC 图像与 TNC 图像在胆管结石检测方面具有可比性,可替代 TNC 图像以减少辐射剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验