Population Council, New Delhi, India.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, India.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202562. eCollection 2018.
This study evaluates an eight-session behavior change health intervention with women's self-help groups (SHGs) aimed to promote healthy maternal and newborn practices among the more socially and economically marginalized groups.
Using a pre-post quasi-experimental design, a total of 545 SHGs were divided into two groups: a control group, which received the usual microcredit intervention; and an intervention group, which received additional participatory training around maternal, neonatal, and child health issues. Women members of SHGs who had a live birth in the 12 months preceding the survey were surveyed on demographics, practices around maternal, neonatal and child health (MNCH), and collectivization. Outcome effects were assessed using difference-in-difference (DID) methods.
Women from the SHGs with health intervention, relative to controls over time (time 1 to time 2), were more likely to: use contraceptive methods (DID: 9 percentage points [pp], p<0.001), have institutional delivery (DID: 9pp, p<0.05), practice skin-to-skin care (DID: 17pp, p<0.05), delay bathing for 3 or more days (DID: 19pp, p<0.001), initiate timely breastfeeding (DID: 21pp, p<0.001), exclusively breastfeed the child (DID: 27pp, p<0.001), and provide age-appropriate immunization (DID: 9pp, p<0.001). Additionally, women from the SHGs with health intervention when compared to the control group over time were more likely to report: collective efficacy (DID: 17pp, p<0.001), support through accompanying SHG members for antenatal care (DID: 8pp, p<0.05), receive a visit from SHG member within 2 days post-delivery (DID: 32pp, p<0.001), and receive reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health information from an SHG member (DID: 45pp, p<0.001).
Findings demonstrate that structured participatory communication on MNCH with women's groups improve positive health practices. In addition, SHGs can reach a substantial proportion of women while providing an avenue for pregnant women and young mothers to be assisted by others in learning and practicing healthy behaviors, thus building social cohesion on health.
本研究评估了一项针对女性自助小组(SHG)的八节行为改变健康干预措施,旨在促进社会和经济地位较低的群体中更健康的母婴和新生儿护理实践。
采用前后准实验设计,将 545 个 SHG 分为两组:对照组接受常规小额信贷干预;干预组接受有关母婴、新生儿和儿童健康问题的额外参与式培训。在调查前 12 个月内有活产的 SHG 女性成员接受了人口统计学、母婴、新生儿和儿童健康(MNCH)以及集体化方面的调查。使用差值法(DID)评估结果效果。
与对照组相比,接受健康干预的 SHG 女性随着时间的推移(时间 1 到时间 2),更有可能:使用避孕方法(DID:9 个百分点 [pp],p<0.001)、选择医疗机构分娩(DID:9pp,p<0.05)、进行皮肤接触护理(DID:17pp,p<0.05)、延迟洗澡 3 天以上(DID:19pp,p<0.001)、尽早开始母乳喂养(DID:21pp,p<0.001)、纯母乳喂养(DID:27pp,p<0.001)和提供适龄免疫接种(DID:9pp,p<0.001)。此外,与对照组相比,接受健康干预的 SHG 女性随着时间的推移更有可能报告:集体效能感(DID:17pp,p<0.001)、SHG 成员陪同进行产前护理的支持(DID:8pp,p<0.05)、分娩后 2 天内有 SHG 成员来访(DID:32pp,p<0.001)以及从 SHG 成员那里获得生殖、母婴、新生儿和儿童健康信息(DID:45pp,p<0.001)。
研究结果表明,与妇女团体就母婴健康问题进行结构化的参与式沟通可以改善积极的健康行为。此外,SHG 可以接触到大量的女性,同时为孕妇和年轻母亲提供一个由他人协助学习和实践健康行为的途径,从而在健康方面建立社会凝聚力。