Kouimtsidis Christos, Duka Theodora, Palmer Emily, Lingford-Hughes Anne
Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sussex Addiction Research and Intervention Centre (SARIC), School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 16;10:339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00339. eCollection 2019.
In this review paper, we discuss how the overarching concept of prehabilitation is applicable to alcohol dependence. Central to prehabilitation are the concepts of expected harm, risks, and proactive planning to eliminate the harm or cope with the risks. We review the evidence from animal models, psychological experimental studies, as well as pharmacological studies, on the potential risks and harms associated with medically assisted alcohol detoxification and the current treatment paradigm for alcohol dependence. Animal models provide an approximation mostly of the physical aspect of alcohol withdrawal and detoxification process and make predictions about the development of the phenomena in humans. Despite their limitations, these models provide good evidence that withdrawal from chronic ethanol use induces cognitive impairment, which is worsened by repeated bouts of withdrawal and that these impairments are dependent on the duration of alcohol withdrawal. Initial clinical observations with alcohol-dependent patients confirmed increased incidence of seizures. In recent years, accumulating evidence suggests that patients who have had repeated episodes of withdrawal also show changes in their affect, increased craving, as well as significant deterioration of cognitive abilities, when compared to patients with fewer withdrawals. Alcohol dependence is associated with tolerance and withdrawal, with neuroadaptations in γ-Aminobutyric Acid-A Receptor (GABA-A) and glutamatergic -methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors playing key roles. It is suggested that dysregulation of the NMDA receptor system underpins alcohol-related memory impairments. Finally, we discuss the Structured Preparation for Alcohol Detoxification (SPADe) as an example of how prehabilitation has been applied in clinical practice. We discuss the importance of partial control over drinking as an interim step toward abstinence and early introduction of lifestyle changes for both the patient and the immediate environment prior to detoxification and while the patient is still drinking.
在这篇综述论文中,我们探讨了康复前预适应这一总体概念如何适用于酒精依赖。康复前预适应的核心概念是预期危害、风险以及为消除危害或应对风险而进行的积极规划。我们回顾了来自动物模型、心理学实验研究以及药理学研究的证据,这些证据涉及医学辅助戒酒和当前酒精依赖治疗模式所带来的潜在风险与危害。动物模型大多能近似反映酒精戒断和解毒过程的生理方面,并对人类身上这些现象的发展做出预测。尽管存在局限性,但这些模型提供了充分的证据表明,长期饮酒后戒断会导致认知障碍,反复戒断会使这种障碍加剧,而且这些障碍取决于酒精戒断的持续时间。对酒精依赖患者的初步临床观察证实癫痫发作的发生率有所增加。近年来,越来越多的证据表明,与戒断次数较少的患者相比,经历过多次戒断的患者在情感、渴望增加以及认知能力显著恶化方面也表现出变化。酒精依赖与耐受性和戒断有关,γ-氨基丁酸-A受体(GABA-A)和谷氨酸能N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体的神经适应性变化起关键作用。有人认为NMDA受体系统失调是酒精相关记忆障碍的基础。最后,我们以酒精解毒结构化准备(SPADe)为例,讨论康复前预适应在临床实践中的应用方式。我们讨论了在戒酒前以及患者仍在饮酒时,将部分控制饮酒作为迈向戒酒的过渡步骤以及尽早为患者及其直接环境引入生活方式改变的重要性。