• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种用于预测内科住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症的风险评估模型在入院时的一致性水平。

Level of concordance between two risk-assessment models for predicting venous thromboembolism in medical patients at admission.

作者信息

De Lorenzo-Pinto Ana, García-Sánchez Raquel, Durán-García Esther, Castuera-Gil Ana, Pascual-Izquierdo Cristina, Marzal-Alfaro Belén, Arrabal-Durán Paula, Herranz-Alonso Ana, Andueza-Lillo Juan A, Sanjurjo-Sáez María

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Emergency Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 May;23(3):141-144. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000694. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000694
PMID:31156835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6451527/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the level of concordance between the 2007 PRETEMED guidelines and the 2012 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines in medical patients at admission.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study was designed and included all adult medical patients admitted from an emergency department. Firstly, patients classified as low-moderate risk and high risk according to PRETEMED were compared to those classified by ACCP as low and high risk. Secondly, the same analysis was performed but this time low and moderate-high risk patients according to PRETEMED were compared to ACCP low and high risk patients. The level of concordance was calculated using the kappa concordance index. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of the hospital.

RESULTS

The analysis was performed with 207 patients; 53.1% were male and the median age was 75.3 years (minimum 18, maximum 100 years old). The most common diagnosis at admission was related to a respiratory disease (37.2%). The level of concordance was 0.59 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.70) when moderate risk patients were grouped with low-risk patients and 0.53 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.65) when moderate risk patients were grouped with high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of concordance between both guides is moderate. It would be helpful to confirm whether the level of agreement improves when the patient's condition stabilises after several days of hospitalisation.

摘要

目的

评估2007年PRETEMED指南与2012年美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)指南在成年内科住院患者入院时的一致性水平。

方法

设计一项横断面、观察性和描述性研究,纳入所有从急诊科收治的成年内科患者。首先,将根据PRETEMED分类为低-中度风险和高风险的患者与根据ACCP分类为低风险和高风险的患者进行比较。其次,进行同样的分析,但这次将根据PRETEMED分类为低风险和中-高风险的患者与ACCP分类的低风险和高风险患者进行比较。使用kappa一致性指数计算一致性水平。该研究获得了医院临床研究伦理委员会的批准。

结果

对207例患者进行了分析;53.1%为男性,中位年龄为75.3岁(最小18岁,最大100岁)。入院时最常见的诊断与呼吸系统疾病有关(37.2%)。当将中度风险患者与低风险患者归为一组时,一致性水平为0.59(95%CI 0.48至0.70);当将中度风险患者与高风险患者归为一组时,一致性水平为0.53(95%CI 0.42至0.65)。

结论

两个指南之间的一致性水平为中等。确认患者住院几天后病情稳定时一致性水平是否提高将有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Level of concordance between two risk-assessment models for predicting venous thromboembolism in medical patients at admission.两种用于预测内科住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症的风险评估模型在入院时的一致性水平。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 May;23(3):141-144. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000694. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
2
[Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk in hospitalized medical patients. Concordance between PRETEMED guide and the recommendations of the viii conference of the American College of Chest Physicians].[住院内科患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估。PRETEMED指南与美国胸科医师学会第八次会议建议之间的一致性]
Med Clin (Barc). 2012 Nov 3;139(11):467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2011.07.022. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
3
Concordance among venous thromboembolism risk assessment models.静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的一致性。
Med Clin (Barc). 2018 Jan 23;150(2):61-63. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
4
Impact of the ENDORSE study results on thromboprophylaxis prescribing patterns in medical patients attending the emergency department.
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;69(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12461. Epub 2014 May 23.
5
Review of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients attending Cork University Hospital.科克大学医院就诊患者的血栓栓塞预防评估。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Jun;35(3):439-46. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9760-5. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
6
Thromboprophylaxis use and concordance with guidelines among medical and surgical patients in Morocco.摩洛哥内科和外科患者的血栓预防用药情况及与指南的一致性。
Thromb Res. 2014 May;133(5):725-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.01.036. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
7
Differences among clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke in atrial fibrillation: implications for therapy in daily practice.心房颤动患者卒中预测临床分类方案的差异:对日常治疗的启示
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Sep;12(9):828-34. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.018.
8
Assessment of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients hospitalized in Andalusia. A multicenter study.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2015 Apr;215(3):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalised medically ill patients. The ENDORSE Global Survey.静脉血栓栓塞风险与住院内科患者的预防。ENDORSE 全球调查。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Apr;103(4):736-48. doi: 10.1160/TH09-09-0667. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
10
Evaluation of VTE Prophylaxis in an Educational Hospital: Comparison Between the Institutional Guideline (Caprini 2006) and the ACCP Guideline (Ninth Edition).一家教学医院的静脉血栓栓塞症预防评估:机构指南(2006年卡普里尼)与美国胸科医师学会指南(第九版)的比较
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2016 Oct;22(7):627-32. doi: 10.1177/1076029615575344. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the ENDORSE study results on thromboprophylaxis prescribing patterns in medical patients attending the emergency department.
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;69(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12461. Epub 2014 May 23.
2
Discrepancies between two lipid-lowering guidelines for CVD prevention in seemingly healthy individuals-case study Lebanon.两种用于貌似健康个体的 CVD 预防的降脂指南之间的差异-黎巴嫩案例研究。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2013 Sep;3(3):129-36. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2013.07.01.
3
Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer outpatients.癌症门诊患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Nov;11(11):1431-8. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0164.
4
[Venous thromboprophylaxis in medical patients: an application review].
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2013 May-Jun;59(3):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ramb.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 May 13.
5
About the discrepancies between consensus documents, clinical practice guidelines, and legal regulations in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.关于2型糖尿病治疗中共识文件、临床实践指南和法律法规之间的差异。
Nefrologia. 2012 Jul 17;32(4):419-26. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2012.Jun.11576.
6
Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.非外科患者的 VTE 预防:抗血栓治疗和血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会基于证据的临床实践指南。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e195S-e226S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2296.
7
[Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk in hospitalized medical patients. Concordance between PRETEMED guide and the recommendations of the viii conference of the American College of Chest Physicians].[住院内科患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估。PRETEMED指南与美国胸科医师学会第八次会议建议之间的一致性]
Med Clin (Barc). 2012 Nov 3;139(11):467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2011.07.022. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
8
Thromboprophylaxis in a pediatric hospital: a patient-safety and quality-improvement initiative.儿科医院的血栓预防:一项患者安全和质量改进计划。
Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(5):e1326-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3282. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
9
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for hospitalized medical patients, current status and strategies to improve.住院内科患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防:现状与改进策略。
Ann Thorac Med. 2010 Oct;5(4):195-200. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.69104.
10
Risk factors for venous thromboembolism.静脉血栓栓塞的危险因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 29;56(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.057.