Hartman Jason, Granville Michelle, Jacobson Robert E
Pain Medicine, Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, USA.
Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, USA.
Cureus. 2019 Mar 19;11(3):e4268. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4268.
Radiologic findings in combination with clinical symptoms are critical in the diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) as well as the need for surgical treatment. Dynamic radiographs, computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) each provide different but interrelated pieces of information in the patient with lumbar spinal stenosis. Making a treatment decision based only on one of the radiographic studies may negatively affect the treatment outcome. Minimal procedures are predicated on identifying and performing surgery on a limited segment of the lumbar spinal canal affected by the stenosis compared to what occurs during open surgery where the judgment of the spine surgeon often expanded the decompression area based on real-time intra-operative findings correlated with radiologic findings of stenosis. As newer, less invasive procedures are gaining acceptance for surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with symptomatic claudication, radiologic studies become more critical in selecting the correct procedure since there may be no or minimal surgical visual confirmation of the pathology. This article will review how the finding of spinal deformity and motion, canal dimensions, viewed in multiple planes and the presence of facet fluid impact treatment decisions. Differences in these abnormal radiologic findings can affect the selection of surgical procedures ranging from open decompression with pedicle fixation, decompression with interlaminar stabilization, minimally invasive lumbar decompression, and percutaneous interspinous implants providing distraction without decompression. With the development of less invasive procedures, lumbar spinal stenosis is being evaluated and treated not only by spine surgeons but also by interventional pain and neuroradiology physicians that may not be totally familiar with the complexity of the pathology and neuro-radiology of LSS. Each radiologic study provides different information. The goal of this report is to provide a framework for the use of studies such as plain X-rays, dynamic films, MRI, and CT scans as well as the importance of different views, and how to use them in evaluating the abnormal radiologic anatomy seen with LSS and in selecting the most appropriate procedure.
放射学检查结果与临床症状相结合,对于腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的诊断、严重程度评估以及手术治疗需求的判断至关重要。动态X线片、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在腰椎管狭窄症患者中各自提供不同但相互关联的信息。仅基于其中一项影像学检查做出治疗决策可能会对治疗结果产生负面影响。与开放手术相比,微创手术基于识别并对受狭窄影响的腰椎管有限节段进行手术,在开放手术中脊柱外科医生的判断通常会根据与狭窄的放射学检查结果相关的实时术中发现来扩大减压区域。随着更新的、侵入性较小的手术方法越来越多地被用于治疗有症状性间歇性跛行的椎管狭窄症,放射学检查在选择正确的手术方法时变得更加关键,因为对于病变可能没有手术视觉确认或仅有极少的手术视觉确认。本文将综述脊柱畸形和活动度、椎管尺寸在多个平面上的观察结果以及小关节积液的发现如何影响治疗决策。这些异常放射学检查结果的差异会影响手术方法的选择,范围从带椎弓根固定的开放减压、椎板间稳定减压、微创腰椎减压以及提供撑开而不减压的经皮棘突间植入物。随着侵入性较小的手术方法的发展,腰椎管狭窄症不仅由脊柱外科医生评估和治疗,还由可能不完全熟悉LSS病理和神经放射学复杂性的介入疼痛科医生和神经放射科医生进行评估和治疗。每项放射学检查都提供不同的信息。本报告的目的是提供一个框架,说明如何使用诸如普通X线片、动态影像、MRI和CT扫描等检查,以及不同视图的重要性,以及如何在评估LSS所见的异常放射学解剖结构和选择最合适的手术方法时使用这些检查。