• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mls不是一个单一的基因等位基因系统。不同的刺激性Mls决定簇是至少两个非等位、不连锁基因的产物。

Mls is not a single gene, allelic system. Different stimulatory Mls determinants are the products of at least two nonallelic, unlinked genes.

作者信息

Abe R, Ryan J J, Hodes R J

机构信息

Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

J Exp Med. 1987 Oct 1;166(4):1150-5. doi: 10.1084/jem.166.4.1150.

DOI:10.1084/jem.166.4.1150
PMID:3116144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2188718/
Abstract

Mls determinants share with MHC products the unique property of stimulating T cells at extraordinarily high precursor frequencies. The Mls system was originally described as a single locus on chromosome 1, with four alleles, Mlsa, Mlsb, Mlsc, and Mlsd, that encode polymorphic cell surface structures. However, the fundamental issues of polymorphism and allelism in the Mls system remain controversial. To clarify these questions, a formal segregation analysis of the genes encoding Mlsa and Mlsc determinants was carried out by testing the capacity of spleen cells from progeny of (Mlsa X Mlsc)F1 X Mlsb breedings to stimulate responses by unprimed T cells and by Mlsa- and Mlsc-specific cloned T cells. The results of this analysis indicated that the gene encoding Mlsa determinants is neither allelic to nor linked to the gene encoding Mlsc determinants. Together with previous findings, these results also suggest that another strongly stimulatory type, Mlsd, in fact results from the independent expression of unlinked Mlsa and Mlsc gene products. Based on these observations, it is concluded that, contrary to conventional concepts, the stimulatory phenotypes designated as Mlsa, Mlsc, and Mlsd can be accounted for by the independent expression of the products of at least two unlinked gene loci.

摘要

Mls决定簇与MHC产物具有共同特性,即在极高的前体频率下刺激T细胞。Mls系统最初被描述为位于1号染色体上的一个单一位点,有四个等位基因,即Mlsa、Mlsb、Mlsc和Mlsd,它们编码多态性细胞表面结构。然而,Mls系统中多态性和等位性的基本问题仍存在争议。为了阐明这些问题,通过检测(Mlsa×Mlsc)F1与Mlsb杂交后代的脾细胞刺激未致敏T细胞以及Mlsa和Mlsc特异性克隆T细胞反应的能力,对编码Mlsa和Mlsc决定簇的基因进行了正式的分离分析。该分析结果表明,编码Mlsa决定簇的基因既与编码Mlsc决定簇的基因非等位,也不与之连锁。结合先前的研究结果,这些结果还表明,另一种强刺激类型Mlsd实际上是由不连锁的Mlsa和Mlsc基因产物的独立表达所致。基于这些观察结果,得出的结论是,与传统概念相反,被指定为Mlsa、Mlsc和Mlsd的刺激表型可以由至少两个不连锁基因座的产物的独立表达来解释。

相似文献

1
Mls is not a single gene, allelic system. Different stimulatory Mls determinants are the products of at least two nonallelic, unlinked genes.Mls不是一个单一的基因等位基因系统。不同的刺激性Mls决定簇是至少两个非等位、不连锁基因的产物。
J Exp Med. 1987 Oct 1;166(4):1150-5. doi: 10.1084/jem.166.4.1150.
2
Clonal analysis of the Mls system. A reappraisal of polymorphism and allelism among Mlsa, Mlsc, and Mlsd.Mls系统的克隆分析。对Mlsa、Mlsc和Mlsd之间多态性和等位性的重新评估。
J Exp Med. 1987 Apr 1;165(4):1113-29. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.4.1113.
3
The Mlsd-defined primary mixed lymphocyte reaction: a composite response to Mlsa and Mlsc determinants.由Mlsd定义的主要混合淋巴细胞反应:对Mlsa和Mlsc决定簇的复合反应。
J Immunol. 1987 Jun 15;138(12):4085-92.
4
A reappraisal of Mls genetics.对Mls遗传学的重新评估。
J Immunogenet. 1988 Feb-Jun;15(1-3):5-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313x.1988.tb00402.x.
5
Mls determinants recognized by T cells.T细胞识别的Mls决定簇。
J Immunogenet. 1988 Feb-Jun;15(1-3):11-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313x.1988.tb00403.x.
6
T cell recognition of Mls. T cell clones demonstrate polymorphism between Mlsa, Mlsc, and Mlsd.T细胞对Mls的识别。T细胞克隆显示出Mlsa、Mlsc和Mlsd之间的多态性。
J Immunol. 1987 Jan 15;138(2):373-9.
7
Immune responses in vitro, XIV. Undetectability of Mlsb- and Mlsc-encoded products on F1 cells possessing Mlsa or Mlsd.体外免疫反应,十四。在具有Mlsa或Mlsd的F1细胞上未检测到Mlsb和Mlsc编码的产物。
Immunogenetics. 1984;20(3):301-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00364211.
8
Genetic analysis of the presentation of minor lymphocyte-stimulating determinants. II. Differing non-MHC control of super-stimulatory and more poorly stimulatory Mls phenotypes.次要淋巴细胞刺激决定簇表现的遗传分析。II. 超刺激和刺激较弱的Mls表型的不同非MHC控制
J Immunol. 1990 Apr 1;144(7):2506-17.
9
Activation of abundant precursors associated with the response of Mlsa H-2k spleens to Mlsc antigen.与Mlsa H-2k脾脏对Mlsc抗原反应相关的大量前体的激活。
Immunol Invest. 1987 Aug;16(5):413-23. doi: 10.3109/08820138709087095.
10
The expression of Mlsc determinants on Mlsa, Mlsb, and Mlsx prototypic strains.Mlsc决定簇在Mlsa、Mlsb和Mlsx原型菌株上的表达。
Immunogenetics. 1988;28(4):221-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00345498.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacterial and viral superantigens: roles in autoimmunity?细菌和病毒超抗原:在自身免疫中的作用?
Ann Rheum Dis. 1993 Mar;52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6-16. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.suppl_1.s6.
2
Multigene control of Mlsc.Mlsc的多基因控制
Immunogenetics. 1988;28(6):412-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00355372.
3
Inhibition of antiskin allograft immunity induced by infusions with photoinactivated effector T lymphocytes (PET cells).通过输注光灭活效应T淋巴细胞(PET细胞)诱导的抗皮肤同种异体移植免疫的抑制作用。
Yale J Biol Med. 1989 Nov-Dec;62(6):595-609.
4
Restricted tissue distribution of Mlsa determinants. Stimulation of Mlsa-reactive T cells by B cells but not by dendritic cells or macrophages.Mlsa决定簇的组织分布受限。B细胞可刺激Mlsa反应性T细胞,而树突状细胞或巨噬细胞则不能。
J Exp Med. 1989 Jan 1;169(1):1-12. doi: 10.1084/jem.169.1.1.
5
Multi-gene/allele control of Mlsb of CBA/H.CBA/H小鼠Mlsb的多基因/等位基因控制
Immunogenetics. 1989;29(3):155-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00373640.
6
Analysis of Mlsc genetics. A novel instance of genetic redundancy.多重序列分型(Mlsc)遗传学分析。一个基因冗余的新实例。
J Exp Med. 1989 Oct 1;170(4):1059-73. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.4.1059.
7
The expression of Mlsc determinants on Mlsa, Mlsb, and Mlsx prototypic strains.Mlsc决定簇在Mlsa、Mlsb和Mlsx原型菌株上的表达。
Immunogenetics. 1988;28(4):221-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00345498.
8
Genetic analysis of the Mls system. Formal Mls typing of the commonly used inbred strains.Mls系统的遗传分析。常用近交系的正式Mls分型。
Immunogenetics. 1991;33(1):62-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00211697.
9
Allostimulatory analysis of a newly-defined and widely-distributed Mls superantigen.一种新定义且广泛分布的Mls超抗原的共刺激分析
Immunogenetics. 1991;34(2):88-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00211421.
10
T cell receptor-mediated recognition of self-ligand induces signaling in immature thymocytes before negative selection.T细胞受体介导的自身配体识别在阴性选择之前就会在未成熟胸腺细胞中诱导信号传导。
J Exp Med. 1992 Aug 1;176(2):459-68. doi: 10.1084/jem.176.2.459.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancement of the mixed lymphocyte reaction by in vivo treatment of stimulator spleen cells with anti-IgD antibody.通过用抗IgD抗体对刺激脾细胞进行体内处理来增强混合淋巴细胞反应。
J Immunol. 1983 Jun;130(6):2534-41.
2
T cell clones with dual specificity for M1s and various major histocompatibility complex determinants.对M1s和各种主要组织相容性复合体决定簇具有双重特异性的T细胞克隆。
J Exp Med. 1981 Dec 1;154(6):1970-4. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.6.1970.
3
Evidence that strong Mls determinants are nonpolymorphic.强有力的Mls决定簇是非多态性的证据。
Transplantation. 1981 May;31(5):376-8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198105010-00014.
4
Immunogenetic and biological aspects of in vitro lymphocyte allotransformation (MLR) in the mouse.小鼠体外淋巴细胞同种异体转化(混合淋巴细胞反应)的免疫遗传学和生物学方面
Transplant Rev. 1973;15:62-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1973.tb00111.x.
5
T cell responses to Mls determinants are restricted by cross-reactive MHC determinants.T细胞对Mls决定簇的反应受交叉反应性MHC决定簇的限制。
J Immunol. 1985 Apr;134(4):2071-8.
6
The Mlsd-defined primary mixed lymphocyte reaction: a composite response to Mlsa and Mlsc determinants.由Mlsd定义的主要混合淋巴细胞反应:对Mlsa和Mlsc决定簇的复合反应。
J Immunol. 1987 Jun 15;138(12):4085-92.
7
Clonal analysis of the Mls system. A reappraisal of polymorphism and allelism among Mlsa, Mlsc, and Mlsd.Mls系统的克隆分析。对Mlsa、Mlsc和Mlsd之间多态性和等位性的重新评估。
J Exp Med. 1987 Apr 1;165(4):1113-29. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.4.1113.
8
T cell recognition of Mls. T cell clones demonstrate polymorphism between Mlsa, Mlsc, and Mlsd.T细胞对Mls的识别。T细胞克隆显示出Mlsa、Mlsc和Mlsd之间的多态性。
J Immunol. 1987 Jan 15;138(2):373-9.
9
Cross-reactivity exists between Mlsa and Mlsd lymphocyte-activating determinants as demonstrated by the negative clonal selection of responder cells in a mixed lymphocyte reaction.正如混合淋巴细胞反应中反应细胞的阴性克隆选择所证明的那样,Mlsa和Mlsd淋巴细胞激活决定簇之间存在交叉反应性。
Transplant Proc. 1979 Jun;11(2):1377-8.