Suppr超能文献

成人骨髓炎的氯化铟-111闪烁扫描术

Indium-111 chloride scintigraphy in adult osteomyelitis.

作者信息

Iles S E, Ehrlich L E, Saliken J C, Martin R H

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 1987 Oct;28(10):1540-5.

PMID:3116175
Abstract

Osteomyelitis is a common clinical problem that may be difficult to diagnose. We compared the performance of indium-111-labeled white cells ([111In]WBC) to 111In chloride ([111In]Cl) in two groups of adult patients suspected to have osteomyelitis or septic arthritis. Using [111In] WBC, 52 scans were performed on 51 patients. Nineteen patients had osteomyelitis. The sensitivity was 84% and specificity 82%. Using [111In]Cl, 48 scans were performed on 47 patients. Twelve had osteomyelitis. Sensitivity was 91%, and specificity was 89%. In each group, one false-negative study occurred in vertebral osteomyelitis. Three false-negative studies using [111In]WBC were due to failure to distinguish between combined bone and soft-tissue infection and soft-tissue infection alone. False-positive studies in both groups were due to overlying soft-tissue infection or inflammatory arthritis. Chi-squared test showed no significant difference in performance between the two agents. Indium-111 chloride is easier to prepare and use than [111In]WBC, which requires a time-consuming labeling process.

摘要

骨髓炎是一个常见的临床问题,可能难以诊断。我们比较了两组疑似患有骨髓炎或脓毒性关节炎的成年患者中铟-111标记的白细胞([111In]WBC)与氯化铟([111In]Cl)的诊断效能。使用[111In]WBC对51例患者进行了52次扫描。19例患者患有骨髓炎。敏感性为84%,特异性为82%。使用[111In]Cl对47例患者进行了48次扫描。12例患有骨髓炎。敏感性为91%,特异性为89%。在每组中,椎体骨髓炎均出现1例假阴性检查。使用[111In]WBC的3例假阴性检查是由于未能区分合并的骨与软组织感染和单纯的软组织感染。两组中的假阳性检查均归因于覆盖的软组织感染或炎性关节炎。卡方检验显示两种试剂的诊断效能无显著差异。氯化铟-111比[111In]WBC更易于制备和使用,后者需要耗时的标记过程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验