Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Clinical and Experimental Senology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Sep;118:178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
The aim of the study is to analyse whether letrozole (L) and zoledronic acid plus L (ZL) are more effective than tamoxifen (T) as adjuvant endocrine treatment of premenopausal patients with breast cancer with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumours.
In a phase 3 trial, 1065 premenopausal patients with HR + early breast cancer received triptorelin to suppress ovarian function and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to adjuvant T, L or ZL for 5 years. Cancer recurrence, second breast or non-breast cancer and death were considered events for the intention-to-treat disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.
With a 64-month median follow-up and 134 reported events, the disease-free rate at 5 years was 85.4%, 93.2% and 93.3% with T, L and ZL, respectively (overall P = 0.008). The hazard ratio for a DFS event was 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.80; P = 0.003) with ZL vs T, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.07; P = 0.06) with L vs T and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.12; P = 0.22) with ZL vs L. With 36 deaths, there was no significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.14). Treatment was stopped for toxicity or refusal in 7.3%, 7.3% and 16.6% patients, and in the safety population, grade 3-4 side-effects were reported in 4.2%, 6.9% and 9.1% patients treated with T, L or ZL, respectively.
HOBOE study shows that in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer undergoing ovarian function suppression with triptorelin, ZL significantly improves DFS, while worsening compliance and toxicity, as compared with T. (NCT00412022).
本研究旨在分析来曲唑(L)和唑来膦酸联合 L(ZL)作为激素受体阳性(HR+)肿瘤绝经前乳腺癌患者的辅助内分泌治疗是否比他莫昔芬(T)更有效。
在一项 3 期试验中,1065 例 HR+早期乳腺癌绝经前患者接受曲普瑞林抑制卵巢功能,并按 1:1:1 随机分配接受辅助 T、L 或 ZL 治疗 5 年。癌症复发、第二乳腺癌或非乳腺癌和死亡被视为意向治疗无病生存(DFS)分析的事件。
中位随访 64 个月,报告 134 例事件,5 年无病生存率分别为 T、L 和 ZL 组为 85.4%、93.2%和 93.3%(总体 P=0.008)。与 T 相比,与 ZL 相比 DFS 事件的风险比为 0.52(95%置信区间 [CI],0.34 至 0.80;P=0.003),与 L 相比为 0.72(95% CI,0.48 至 1.07;P=0.06),与 ZL 相比为 0.70(95% CI,0.44 至 1.12;P=0.22)。有 36 例死亡,总生存无显著差异(P=0.14)。由于毒性或拒绝治疗,分别有 7.3%、7.3%和 16.6%的患者停止治疗,在安全性人群中,分别有 4.2%、6.9%和 9.1%接受 T、L 或 ZL 治疗的患者出现 3-4 级不良反应。
HOBOE 研究表明,在接受曲普瑞林抑制卵巢功能的早期乳腺癌绝经前患者中,与 T 相比,ZL 显著改善 DFS,但依从性和毒性恶化。(NCT00412022)。