Suppr超能文献

血压与老年人死亡率之间的关联是否因衰弱而不同?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Is the association between blood pressure and mortality in older adults different with frailty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Clinical and Population Sciences Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2019 Sep 1;48(5):627-635. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz072.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to investigate whether the association between blood pressure and clinical outcomes is different in older adults with and without frailty, using observational studies.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from 1st January 2000 to 13th June 2018. PROSPERO CRD42017081635. We included all observational studies reporting clinical outcomes in older adults with an average age over 65 years living in the community with and without treatment that measured blood pressure and frailty using validated methods. Two independent reviewers evaluated study quality and risk of bias using the ROBANS tool. We used generic inverse variance modelling to pool risks of all-cause mortality adjusted for age and sex.

RESULTS

nine observational studies involving 21,906 older adults were included, comparing all-cause mortality over a mean of six years. Fixed effects meta-analysis of six studies demonstrated that in people with frailty, there was no mortality difference associated with systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg compared to systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.16). In the absence of frailty, systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg was associated with lower risk of death compared to systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

evidence from observational studies demonstrates no mortality difference for older people with frailty whose systolic blood pressure is <140 mm Hg, compared to those with a systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg. Current evidence fails to capture the complexities of blood pressure measurement, and the association with non-fatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

通过观察性研究,探讨血压与临床结局的相关性在有无衰弱的老年人中是否存在差异。

方法

从 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 13 日,检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL。PROSPERO CRD42017081635。我们纳入了所有使用经过验证的方法测量血压和衰弱的、报告社区居住的年龄均超过 65 岁的老年人的临床结局的观察性研究,无论有无治疗。两位独立的审查员使用 ROBANS 工具评估了研究质量和偏倚风险。我们使用通用逆方差模型对所有经年龄和性别校正的全因死亡率进行风险汇总。

结果

纳入了 9 项共涉及 21906 名老年人的观察性研究,比较了平均 6 年的全因死亡率。6 项研究的固定效应荟萃分析表明,在衰弱患者中,与收缩压>140mmHg 相比,收缩压<140mmHg 与死亡率无差异(HR 1.02,95%CI 0.90 至 1.16)。在无衰弱的情况下,与收缩压>140mmHg 相比,收缩压<140mmHg 与死亡风险降低相关(HR 0.86,95%CI 0.77 至 0.96)。

结论

来自观察性研究的证据表明,与收缩压>140mmHg 的衰弱老年人相比,收缩压<140mmHg 的老年人死亡率无差异。目前的证据未能捕捉到血压测量的复杂性,以及与非致命结局的关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验