Phelan B, King E, Richter C, Webster K, Falvey E
College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Sports Medicine Department, Sports Surgery Clinic, Santry Demesne, Dublin, Ireland.
Phys Ther Sport. 2019 Jul;38:179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 29.
To report ACL-RSI scores in healthy athletes with no history of ACL injury. To measure ACL-RSI scores at nine-months post-ACL reconstruction and to assess the difference between healthy athlete and patient responses.
Cross-sectional study.
Private sports clinic.
499 ACL reconstruction athletes completed the scale as they returned for their nine-month post-operative review appointment. A matched control group of 103 healthy athletes were selected for comparison.
ACL-RSI for participants with controls completing a study-specific modified scale.
The median response to the ACL-RSI for the control group was higher (80.0) (Interquartile Range (IRQ) 66.7-88.3) than that of the ACL reconstruction group (74.17) (IRQ 59.2-86.0), however the effect size was small (0.1).
This study reports normative values for uninjured athletes using the ACL-RSI questionnaire giving a benchmark for recovery after ACLR but also reflecting awareness of injury risk in uninjured athletes. ACL-RSI scores nine-months post-operatively had not yet returned to levels seen in matched uninjured controls.
报告无前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤病史的健康运动员的ACL-RSI评分。测量ACL重建术后九个月时的ACL-RSI评分,并评估健康运动员与患者反应之间的差异。
横断面研究。
私立体育诊所。
499名ACL重建运动员在术后九个月复诊时完成了该量表。选取103名健康运动员作为匹配对照组进行比较。
参与者的ACL-RSI,对照组完成特定研究的改良量表。
对照组对ACL-RSI的中位数反应较高(80.0)(四分位间距(IRQ)66.7 - 88.3),高于ACL重建组(74.17)(IRQ 59.2 - 86.0),但效应量较小(0.1)。
本研究报告了使用ACL-RSI问卷对未受伤运动员的规范值,为ACL重建术后的恢复提供了基准,同时也反映了未受伤运动员对损伤风险的认知。术后九个月的ACL-RSI评分尚未恢复到匹配的未受伤对照组的水平。