Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建术后随时间变化的前交叉韧带重返运动量表(ACL-RSI)评分:一项荟萃分析的系统评价

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) Scores over Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sell Timothy C, Zerega Ryan, King Victoria, Reiter Charles R, Wrona Hailey, Bullock Garrett S, Mills Nilani, Räisänen Anu, Ledbetter Leila, Collins Gary S, Kvist Joanna, Filbay Stephanie R, Losciale Justin M

机构信息

Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

Sports Med Open. 2024 Apr 30;10(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00712-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychological readiness is an important consideration for athletes and clinicians when making return to sport decisions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). To improve our understanding of the extent of deficits in psychological readiness, a systematic review is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate psychological readiness (measured via the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI)) over time after ACL tear and understand if time between injury and surgery, age, and sex are associated with ACL-RSI scores.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched from the earliest date available to March 22, 2022. Articles reporting ACL-RSI scores after ACL tear were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I, RoB-2, and RoBANS tools based on the study design. Evidence certainty was assessed for each analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled ACL-RSI scores, stratified by time post-injury and based on treatment approach (i.e., early ACLR, delayed ACLR, and unclear approach).

RESULTS

A total of 83 studies were included in this review (78% high risk of bias). Evidence certainty was 'weak' or 'limited' for all analyses. Overall, ACL-RSI scores were higher at 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (mean = 61.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 58.6, 64.4], I = 94%) compared to pre-ACLR (mean = 44.4 [95% CI 38.2, 50.7], I = 98%), remained relatively stable, until they reached the highest point 2 to 5 years after ACLR (mean = 70.7 [95% CI 63.0, 78.5], I = 98%). Meta-regression suggests shorter time from injury to surgery, male sex, and older age were associated with higher ACL-RSI scores only 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (heterogeneity explained R = 47.6%), and this reduced 1-2 years after ACLR (heterogeneity explained R = 27.0%).

CONCLUSION

Psychological readiness to return to sport appears to improve early after ACL injury, with little subsequent improvement until ≥ 2-years after ACLR. Longer time from injury to surgery, female sex and older age might be negatively related to ACL-RSI scores 12-24 months after ACLR. Due to the weak evidence quality rating and the considerable importance of psychological readiness for long-term outcomes after ACL injury, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies that maximize internal validity and identify additional prognostic factors for psychological readiness at times critical for return to sport decisions.

REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (OSF), https://osf.io/2tezs/ .

摘要

背景

在做出前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后恢复运动的决定时,心理准备是运动员和临床医生需要重点考虑的因素。为了更好地了解心理准备方面的缺陷程度,有必要进行系统综述。

目的

调查前交叉韧带撕裂后不同时间点的心理准备情况(通过前交叉韧带损伤后恢复运动量表(ACL-RSI)进行测量),并了解受伤与手术之间的时间间隔、年龄和性别是否与ACL-RSI评分相关。

方法

检索了7个数据库,检索时间从各数据库最早可用日期至2022年3月22日。纳入报告前交叉韧带撕裂后ACL-RSI评分的文章。根据研究设计,使用ROBINS-I、RoB-2和RoBANS工具评估偏倚风险。对每项分析评估证据确定性。随机效应荟萃分析汇总了ACL-RSI评分,按受伤后时间分层,并基于治疗方法(即早期ACLR、延迟ACLR和方法不明)进行分析。

结果

本综述共纳入83项研究(78%为高偏倚风险)。所有分析的证据确定性均为“弱”或“有限”。总体而言,与ACLR前相比,ACLR后3至6个月时ACL-RSI评分更高(均值=61.5[95%置信区间(CI)58.6,64.4],I=94%)(ACLR前均值=44.4[95%CI 38.2,50.7],I=98%),且相对稳定,直到ACLR后2至5年达到最高点(均值=70.7[95%CI 63.0,78.5],I=98%)。Meta回归分析表明,受伤至手术时间较短、男性性别和年龄较大仅在ACLR后3至6个月与较高的ACL-RSI评分相关(异质性解释R=47.6%),而在ACLR后1至2年这种相关性降低(异质性解释R=27.0%)。

结论

前交叉韧带损伤后早期恢复运动的心理准备似乎有所改善,在ACLR后≥2年之前后续改善不大。受伤至手术时间较长、女性性别和年龄较大可能与ACLR后12 - 24个月的ACL-RSI评分呈负相关。由于证据质量评级较低,且心理准备对前交叉韧带损伤后的长期结果具有相当重要性,因此迫切需要设计良好的研究,以最大限度地提高内部效度,并确定在恢复运动决策的关键时间点心理准备的其他预后因素。

注册信息

开放科学框架(OSF),https://osf.io/2tezs/

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3c/11061071/949d1ba035d9/40798_2024_712_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验