Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; Centre for Research Excellence in Recovery Following Road Traffic Injuries, Australia.
Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; Centre for Research Excellence in Recovery Following Road Traffic Injuries, Australia.
Injury. 2019 Jul;50(7):1293-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.032. Epub 2019 May 31.
Road traffic crash (RTC) burden is typically reported using hospitalisations or fatalities, yet alternative measures such as work absence provide further insight into RTC impacts. This study aimed to quantify work absence due to compensable RTCs in Victoria, and to determine the characteristics associated with prolonged work absence.
In Victoria, Australia, two systems provide income support whilst unable to work, among other benefits, to those injured during RTCs either at work (workers' compensation: WC) or elsewhere (RTC compensation). Administrative data of accepted claims between July 1 2003 and June 30, 2013 were included from working age people (15-65 years) if at least one day of income support was paid. Total time (in weeks) on income support, and hence absent from work, was calculated for each person and for each predictor (age group, sex, compensation system, length of hospital stay, injury type and road user type). Cox regression was used to determine the likelihood of prolonged work absence by predictor, presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals.
For 36,640 injured people, 1,121,863 weeks were compensated (median 10 weeks). Median work absence was shortest among those involved in a train/tram crash (2.9 weeks, HR:0.57[0.51-0.64]) and those with contusions/abrasions (3.7 weeks, HR:0.66[0.64,0.69]). Median work absence was longest among those with spinal cord injury (115.9 weeks, HR:1.56[1.26,1.92]) or severe acquired brain injury (129.6 weeks, HR:1.60[1.44,1.77]). Work absence likelihood increased with length of hospital stay. Median work absence was similar between compensation systems (WC: 10.1 weeks, RTC: 10.0 weeks) yet likelihood of greater work absence was higher in the RTC compensation system (HR:1.12[1.08,1.17]).
Work absence is both a measureable and important metric for assessing the impact of RTC injury in those working at the time of injury. Work absence was at least ten weeks for more than half of all injured persons, reinforcing need for road safety, injury prevention, and return to work services. Furthermore, this study identified those most at risk of prolonged work absence, providing the opportunity to target specific individuals to develop strategies to reduce work absence, such as occupation-specific rehabilitation or graduated return to work.
道路交通碰撞(RTC)的负担通常通过住院或死亡来报告,但其他措施,如缺勤,可进一步了解 RTC 的影响。本研究旨在量化澳大利亚维多利亚州因可赔偿性 RTC 导致的工作缺勤,并确定与长期工作缺勤相关的特征。
在澳大利亚维多利亚州,两个系统在因 RTC 受伤时为工作中的人(工人赔偿:WC)或其他地方(RTC 赔偿)提供收入支持以及其他福利。如果至少支付了一天的收入支持,从 2003 年 7 月 1 日至 2013 年 6 月 30 日期间,从工作年龄的人(15-65 岁)中包括接受的索赔的行政数据。为每个人和每个预测因素(年龄组、性别、赔偿制度、住院时间、伤害类型和道路使用者类型)计算收入支持的总时间(以周为单位),因此缺勤。使用 Cox 回归来确定每个预测因素下长期工作缺勤的可能性,以危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间表示。
对于 36640 名受伤者,有 1121863 周获得了赔偿(中位数为 10 周)。在火车/电车碰撞中受伤的人(2.9 周,HR:0.57[0.51-0.64])和有瘀伤/擦伤的人(3.7 周,HR:0.66[0.64,0.69])缺勤时间最短。脊髓损伤(115.9 周,HR:1.56[1.26,1.92])或严重获得性脑损伤(129.6 周,HR:1.60[1.44,1.77])的人缺勤时间最长。缺勤时间随住院时间的延长而增加。赔偿制度之间的缺勤中位数相似(WC:10.1 周,RTC:10.0 周),但 RTC 赔偿制度下更长时间的缺勤可能性更高(HR:1.12[1.08,1.17])。
工作缺勤既是衡量受伤时工作的 RTC 伤害影响的一个可衡量和重要的指标。超过一半的受伤者的缺勤时间至少为十周,这再次强调了需要进行道路安全、伤害预防和重返工作服务。此外,本研究确定了那些最有可能长期缺勤的人,为有针对性地针对特定个人制定减少缺勤的策略提供了机会,例如特定职业的康复或逐步重返工作岗位。