Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Disorders, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada Mexico-Xochimilco 289, Colonia Arenal de Guadalupe, CP 143898, Mexico City, Mexico.
Departament of Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;38(9):2327-2337. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04610-5. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
The aim of this work was to produce a consensus-based report for capillaroscopy in rheumatology to be used in daily clinical practice.
A written Delphi questionnaire regarding capillaroscopy report was developed from a literature review and expert consensus. The Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international panel including 25 rheumatologists experts in capillaroscopy, asking them to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. The exercise consisted of three online rounds and a face-to-face (live meeting) that took place in the PANLAR 2018 congress held in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
The participants to the first, second, third, and face-to-face round were 22, 21, 21, and 16 rheumatologists, respectively. Fifty-five items were discussed in the first round, 58 in the second, 22 in the third, and 9 in the face-to-face meeting. At the end of the exercise, 46 recommendations for the capillaroscopy report in rheumatology reached a consensus.
This is the first consensus-based report in capillaroscopy. It will be useful in daily clinical practice and to address the effort of the standardization in the technique.
• The current lack of consensus for the capillaroscopy report makes difficult the interpretation of findings as well as follow-up of rheumatic diseases. • This study produced the first international consensus for the format and content of the naifold capillaroscopy report in rheumatology. • The report is an integral part of the capillaroscopy examination and its use in a homogeneous form can help in the correct interpretation of findings in daily practice.
本研究旨在制定基于共识的风湿病毛细血管检查报告,以用于日常临床实践。
通过文献回顾和专家共识制定了一份关于毛细血管检查报告的书面德尔菲问卷调查表。该德尔菲问卷被发送给一个国际专家组,其中包括 25 名毛细血管镜检查专家,要求他们对每一条陈述的同意或不同意程度进行评分。该研究共进行了三轮在线调查和一轮面对面会议(在阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯举行的 PANLAR 2018 大会上进行)。
第一轮、第二轮、第三轮和面对面会议的参与者分别为 22 名、21 名、21 名和 16 名风湿病专家。第一轮讨论了 55 项内容,第二轮讨论了 58 项,第三轮讨论了 22 项,面对面会议讨论了 9 项。在研究结束时,针对风湿病毛细血管检查报告达成了 46 项共识建议。
这是首次针对毛细血管镜检查的基于共识的报告。它将有助于日常临床实践,并有助于规范技术。
目前毛细血管镜检查报告缺乏共识,使得对检查结果的解释以及对风湿性疾病的随访变得困难。
本研究首次针对风湿病中毛细血管镜检查的格式和内容达成了国际共识。
该报告是毛细血管镜检查的组成部分,以统一的形式使用可以帮助在日常实践中正确解释检查结果。