Suppr超能文献

一项关于帕拉米韦三种抗病毒治疗方案治疗原发性病毒性肺炎重症甲型流感的回顾性分析。

A Retrospective Analysis of Three Antiviral Regimens of Peramivir in the Treatment of Severe Influenza A with Primary Viral Pneumonia.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, China.

出版信息

Can Respir J. 2019 Apr 30;2019:3859230. doi: 10.1155/2019/3859230. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the difference of clinical efficacy of peramivir alone and peramivir combined with immunomodulators (either ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum) in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was applied to 45 patients who were diagnosed with severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia in our hospital from December 2017 to March 2018. The cases were divided into three groups: the peramivir group, the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group, and the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group.

RESULTS

The duration of viral nucleic acid positivity in the peramivir group, the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group, and the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group was 6.13 ± 2.06, 6.53 ± 2.72, and 6.10 ± 1.37 days, respectively. The remission time of the clinical symptoms of the peramivir group, the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group, and the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group was 8.06 ± 2.73, 7.94 ± 2.89, and 7.67 ± 1.58 days, respectively. Comparisons between the peramivir group and the peramivir combined with ribonucleic acid group or the peramivir combined with thymopetidum group revealed no significant differences in the duration of virus nucleic acid positivity, remission time of clinical symptoms, time to fever alleviation, and time to cough alleviation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no observed benefit in the addition of ribonucleic acid or thymopetidum when peramivir sodium chloride injection is used in the treatment of severe influenza A with primary viral pneumonia. This trial is registered with ChiCTR1800019417.

摘要

目的

评估更昔洛韦单独与更昔洛韦联合免疫调节剂(核酸或胸腺肽)治疗原发性病毒性肺炎的流感 A 重型患者的临床疗效差异。

方法

采用回顾性分析方法,分析 2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 3 月我院收治的 45 例原发性病毒性肺炎流感 A 重型患者的临床资料。根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为更昔洛韦组、更昔洛韦联合核酸组、更昔洛韦联合胸腺肽组。

结果

更昔洛韦组、更昔洛韦联合核酸组、更昔洛韦联合胸腺肽组病毒核酸转阴时间分别为 6.13±2.06、6.53±2.72、6.10±1.37 天,临床症状缓解时间分别为 8.06±2.73、7.94±2.89、7.67±1.58 天。更昔洛韦组与更昔洛韦联合核酸组或更昔洛韦联合胸腺肽组病毒核酸转阴时间、临床症状缓解时间、退热时间、咳嗽缓解时间比较,差异均无统计学意义。

结论

在更昔洛韦氯化钠注射液治疗原发性病毒性肺炎流感 A 重型患者时,联合应用核酸或胸腺肽并无获益。该研究已在 ChiCTR1800019417 注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e017/6515146/271260652ca6/CRJ2019-3859230.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验