Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 5034 Old Clinic Bldg, CB 7110, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1916-1918. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05087-3. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
Health-related social needs, such as food insecurity, housing instability, and lack of transportation, are associated with worse health outcomes, and are increasingly the focus of health-related social needs interventions within healthcare. Adoption of health-related social needs interventions is often justified by the potential to reduce healthcare costs. However, this can present a conundrum to clinicians. Physicians are often more accustomed to justifying clinical innovation based on improvements in health, in accord with the fundamental values of the medical profession, which include using our knowledge, skills, and the resources at our disposal to improve both individual and public health. In cases where health-related social needs interventions improve health but are not cost-saving, these two types of justifications can conflict. We provide a framework for considering these issues, and an agenda for scholarly work on this topic. Ultimately, if promoting patient and public health are key values for our profession, then understanding when to emphasize values-based care, rather than simply value-based care, is crucial to fulfilling our professional duty.
健康相关的社会需求,如食物无保障、住房不稳定和缺乏交通等,与更糟糕的健康结果相关,并且越来越成为医疗保健中健康相关社会需求干预的焦点。健康相关社会需求干预的采用通常是基于降低医疗成本的潜力来证明其合理性的。然而,这对临床医生来说是一个难题。医生通常更习惯于根据健康的改善来证明临床创新的合理性,这符合医学专业的基本价值观,其中包括利用我们的知识、技能和可支配的资源来改善个人和公共健康。在健康相关社会需求干预措施改善健康但不节省成本的情况下,这两种理由可能会发生冲突。我们提供了一个考虑这些问题的框架,并为这一主题的学术工作制定了议程。最终,如果促进患者和公众健康是我们专业的关键价值观,那么了解何时强调基于价值的护理,而不仅仅是基于价值的护理,对于履行我们的专业职责至关重要。