Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Research Centre for Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
J Mot Behav. 2020;52(3):333-341. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2019.1626337. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
In this study, we compared the effectiveness of concurrent action observation and motor imagery (AO + MI), observing with the intent to imitate (active observation; AO), and passive observation (PO) training interventions for improving eye-hand coordination. Fifty participants were assigned to five groups [AO + MI, AO, PO, physical practice (PP); control] and performed a visuomotor rotation task, whilst eye movements were recorded. Each participant then performed 20 task trials in a training intervention before repeating the visuomotor rotation task in a post-test. As expected, PP produced the greatest improvement in task performance and eye-hand coordination. However, in comparison to the control group, AO + MI training produced a statistically significant increase in both task performance and eye-hand coordination, but no such improvements were found following AO or PO.
在这项研究中,我们比较了同时进行动作观察和运动想象(AO+MI)、意图模仿的观察(主动观察;AO)和被动观察(PO)训练干预对改善手眼协调的效果。五十名参与者被分配到五个组[AO+MI、AO、PO、身体练习(PP);对照组],并执行一个视觉运动旋转任务,同时记录眼动。每个参与者在进行 20 次任务试验的训练干预后,在随后的测试中重复进行视觉运动旋转任务。正如预期的那样,PP 产生了最大的任务表现和手眼协调的改善。然而,与对照组相比,AO+MI 训练在任务表现和手眼协调方面都产生了统计学上的显著提高,但在 AO 或 PO 后没有发现这种改善。