Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Department of Virology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, National Health Laboratory Service, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6990-z.
With Universal Health Coverage and Integrated People-centred Health Care, streamlined health-systems and respectful care are necessary. South Africa has made great strides in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) but with the great burden of HIV, a minimum of birth and 10-week HIV-PCR testing are required for the estimated 360,000 HIV-exposed infants born annually which presents many challenges including delayed results and loss to follow-up. Point-of-care (POC) HIV testing of infants addresses these challenges well and facilitates initiation of HIV-infected infants rapidly after diagnosis for best clinical outcomes.
Objectives were to determine accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of POC testing compared to standard-of-care (SOC) central-laboratory testing. HIV-exposed infants for birth PCR testing in hospital (n = 323) and follow-up at a primary health care clinic (n = 117) in Durban, South Africa were included. A baseline situational-analysis reviewed registers and phoned mothers of HIV-exposed infants prior to the intervention. An effectiveness-implementation study of the Alere™q HIV-1/2 Detect POC test (heel-prick specimen processed in 50 min) was compared with SOC with questionnaires to mothers and staff. Stata 14 was used for analysis.
At baseline 2% of birth HIV tests were missed; only 40% of mothers could be contacted; 17% did not receive birth test result; 19% did not have a 10-week test; 39% had not received the 10-week results. There were 5(1.5%) HIV-infected and 318(98.5%) HIV-negative infants detected in hospital with all clinic babies negative. All positive infants commenced ART before discharge. Ultimately POC and SOC had perfect concordance but for 10 SOC tests researchers actively tracked-down results or repeated tests. Turn around times for SOC tests were on average 8-days (IQR 6-10 days) and for POC testing was 0-days. The POC error-rate was 9,6% with all giving a result when repeated. The majority of mothers (92%) preferred POC testing with 7% having no preference. No staff preferred SOC testing with 79% preferring POC and 21% having no preference.
Point-of-care HIV testing for EID is accurate, feasible and acceptable, with benefits of early ART for all positive infants at birth facilities. We recommend that it be considered best practice for EID.
ISRCTN38911104 registered 9 January 2018 - retrospectively registered.
随着全民健康覆盖和综合以人为本的医疗保健,简化的卫生系统和尊重的护理是必要的。南非在预防母婴传播(PMTCT)方面取得了巨大进展,但由于 HIV 负担沉重,每年约有 36 万名 HIV 暴露婴儿需要进行最低限度的出生和 10 周 HIV-PCR 检测,这带来了许多挑战,包括检测结果延迟和失访。即时检测(POC)婴儿 HIV 检测很好地解决了这些挑战,并在诊断后迅速为感染 HIV 的婴儿启动 HIV 治疗,以获得最佳临床结果。
本研究的目的是确定 POC 检测与标准护理(SOC)中心实验室检测相比的准确性、可行性和可接受性。在南非德班的一家医院(n=323)和一家初级保健诊所(n=117)对进行出生 PCR 检测的 HIV 暴露婴儿进行了研究。在干预之前,进行了一项基于情况的分析,审查了登记册并给 HIV 暴露婴儿的母亲打电话。对 Alere™q HIV-1/2 检测 POCT(足跟采血样本处理时间为 50 分钟)进行了一项有效性实施研究,并与 SOC 进行了比较,同时对母亲和工作人员进行了问卷调查。使用 Stata 14 进行分析。
在基线时,有 2%的出生 HIV 检测结果缺失;仅能联系到 40%的母亲;17%的母亲未收到出生检测结果;19%的婴儿未进行 10 周检测;39%的婴儿未收到 10 周检测结果。在医院共检测到 5 例(1.5%)HIV 感染婴儿和 318 例(98.5%)HIV 阴性婴儿,所有诊所婴儿均为阴性。所有阳性婴儿在出院前均开始接受 ART 治疗。最终 POC 和 SOC 检测结果完全一致,但 SOC 检测有 10 次需要研究者主动追查结果或重复检测。SOC 检测的周转时间平均为 8 天(IQR 6-10 天),而 POC 检测的周转时间为 0 天。POC 检测的错误率为 9.6%,但重复检测时所有检测结果均为阳性。大多数母亲(92%)更喜欢 POC 检测,7%的母亲没有偏好。没有工作人员更喜欢 SOC 检测,79%的工作人员更喜欢 POC 检测,21%的工作人员没有偏好。
即时检测 EID 的 HIV 检测准确、可行且可接受,在出生场所为所有阳性婴儿提供早期 ART 的益处。我们建议将其视为 EID 的最佳实践。
ISRCTN38911104 于 2018 年 1 月 9 日注册-回顾性注册。