Suppr超能文献

健康年轻人在躺卧、坐立和站立三种姿势下的能量消耗差异。

Energy expenditure differences across lying, sitting, and standing positions in young healthy adults.

机构信息

EFFECTS-262 Research Group, Department of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

PROmoting FITness and Health through physical activity research group (PROFITH), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 12;14(6):e0217029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217029. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The time spent in sedentary behaviour represents an important public health burden. To reduce sedentary time in the general population, the simplest, most effective, and most accessible method is to decrease lying and sitting time. We aimed to compare differences on energy expenditure (EE) across lying, sitting, and standing positions; and to analyse the associations between the change on EE of changing from one position to another and anthropometric and body composition parameters in young healthy adults. A total of 55 (69% women) young healthy adults aged 21.7 ± 2.2 participated in the study. We measured EE by indirect calorimetry across lying, sitting, and standing positions following the standard procedures. The EE was significantly higher in standing than in both lying and sitting positions (mean difference: 0.121±0.292 and 0.125±0.241 kcal/min, respectively; all P<0.001), and no differences were observed between lying and sitting positions (P = 1.000). There was a negative association between the EE differences in sitting vs. standing position and lean body mass (P = 0.048), yet no associations between EE differences with the rest of the anthropometric and body composition parameters were observed in each position pair studied (all P>0.321). Our findings support the fact that increasing the time spent standing could be a simple strategy to slightly increase EE. Therefore, our results have important clinical implications including a better monitoring, characterizing, and promoting countermeasures to sedentariness through low-level physical activities.

摘要

久坐行为所耗费的时间是一个重要的公共健康负担。为了减少普通人群的久坐时间,最简单、最有效、最容易实现的方法就是减少躺卧和坐姿时间。我们旨在比较躺卧、坐姿和站立三种姿势下的能量消耗(EE)差异,并分析从一种姿势变为另一种姿势时 EE 变化与年轻健康成年人的人体测量学和身体成分参数之间的相关性。共有 55 名(69%为女性)年轻健康成年人参与了这项研究,年龄为 21.7±2.2 岁。我们按照标准程序通过间接测热法测量了三种姿势下的 EE。与躺卧和坐姿相比,站立时的 EE 显著更高(平均差值分别为 0.121±0.292 和 0.125±0.241 kcal/min;均 P<0.001),而躺卧和坐姿之间的 EE 没有差异(P=1.000)。坐姿与站立位时的 EE 差值与瘦体重呈负相关(P=0.048),但在研究的每一对姿势中,EE 差值与其他人体测量学和身体成分参数之间均无相关性(均 P>0.321)。我们的研究结果支持以下观点,即增加站立时间可能是一个简单的策略,可以略微增加 EE。因此,我们的研究结果具有重要的临床意义,包括通过低水平体力活动更好地监测、描述和促进对久坐的对策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ffb/6561541/24f29f35bc7b/pone.0217029.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Energy expenditure differences across lying, sitting, and standing positions in young healthy adults.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 12;14(6):e0217029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217029. eCollection 2019.
2
Sitting comfortably versus lying down: is there really a difference in energy expenditure?
Clin Nutr. 2014 Feb;33(1):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
3
The Short-Term Effects of Lying, Sitting and Standing on Energy Expenditure in Women.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2018 May 1;11(2):129-136. doi: 10.70252/XDIW6438. eCollection 2018.
4
The Energy Cost of Sitting versus Standing Naturally in Man.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Apr;51(4):726-733. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001841.
7
The Effectiveness of Standing on a Balance Board for Increasing Energy Expenditure.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Aug;50(8):1710-1717. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001595.
8
Differences of energy expenditure while sitting versus standing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Mar;25(5):522-538. doi: 10.1177/2047487317752186. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Energy expenditure of deskwork when sitting, standing or alternating positions.
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Mar 1;67(2):121-127. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw115.
10
Effects of Standing after a Meal on Glucose Metabolism and Energy Expenditure.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 17;20(20):6934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206934.

引用本文的文献

2
The thermoneutral zone in women takes an "arctic" shift compared to men.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 7;121(19):e2311116121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311116121. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
Ambient and Wearable Sensor Technologies for Energy Expenditure Quantification of Ageing Adults.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;22(13):4893. doi: 10.3390/s22134893.
5
Acute Effects of Esports on the Cardiovascular System and Energy Expenditure in Amateur Esports Players.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 11;4:824006. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.824006. eCollection 2022.
6
Experiential motivation and the linguistics of sitting, standing, and lying.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;13(4):e1592. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1592. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
8
Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial.
Sports Med Open. 2020 Oct 2;6(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40798-020-00278-3.
10
Correction: Energy expenditure differences across lying, sitting, and standing positions in young healthy adults.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 1;14(7):e0219372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219372. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
Effects of different exercise training programs on body composition: A randomized control trial.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Jul;29(7):968-979. doi: 10.1111/sms.13414. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
Congruent Validity of Resting Energy Expenditure Predictive Equations in Young Adults.
Nutrients. 2019 Jan 22;11(2):223. doi: 10.3390/nu11020223.
4
Body Composition and S-Klotho Plasma Levels in Middle-Aged Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Rejuvenation Res. 2019 Dec;22(6):478-483. doi: 10.1089/rej.2018.2092. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Differences of energy expenditure while sitting versus standing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Mar;25(5):522-538. doi: 10.1177/2047487317752186. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Association between objectively measured sedentary behavior and a criterion measure of obesity among adults.
Am J Hum Biol. 2018 Mar;30(2). doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23080. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, and cancer: an update and emerging new evidence.
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):e457-e471. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30411-4. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
9
Posture Allocation Revisited: Breaking the Sedentary Threshold of Energy Expenditure for Obesity Management.
Front Physiol. 2017 Jun 22;8:420. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00420. eCollection 2017.
10
Screen Time, Other Sedentary Behaviours, and Obesity Risk in Adults: A Review of Reviews.
Curr Obes Rep. 2017 Jun;6(2):134-147. doi: 10.1007/s13679-017-0256-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验