• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性颈椎损伤中困难气道管理的预测:咽后间隙扩展的影响

Prediction of difficult airway management in traumatic cervical spine injury: influence of retropharyngeal space extension.

作者信息

Lee Jeongwoo, Kim Jeong Seob, Kang Sehrin, Shin Yu Seob, Doo A Ram

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, South Korea,

Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea,

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 May 17;15:669-675. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S195216. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S195216
PMID:31190847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6526919/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retropharyngeal hematoma following cervical spine trauma may lead to life-threatening upper airway obstruction and difficult airway management. This retrospective study was performed to investigate whether the extension of retropharyngeal space (RPS) was associated with difficult intubation by direct laryngoscopy in traumatic cervical spine injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients who had undergone direct endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia for cervical spine surgery were retrospectively identified. Laryngoscopic grade by Cormack-Lehane (C-L) classification was collected; grade 1 or 2 was categorized as easy laryngoscopy, whereas grade 3 or 4 was categorized as difficult laryngoscopy. In these patients, RPS thickness and the proportions of RPS to the vertebral bodies were measured at the 2nd, 5th and 7th cervical spine levels using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine. Measures of RPS were compared between easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Relationships between measures of RPS and difficult laryngoscopy were analyzed with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

RPS thickness at C2 was significantly greater in difficult laryngoscopy (median 14.29 mm, IQR: 9.75-18.04) than easy laryngoscopy (median 5.10, IQR: 4.33-5.94, <0.001). Proportion of RPS to the C2 vertebral body were significantly higher in difficult laryngoscopy than in easy laryngoscopy (<0.001). RPS thickness and the proportion of RPS to the vertebral body were significantly associated with difficult laryngoscopy (OR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.38-3.30; <0.001 and OR=1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.21; <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

RPS extension at the upper cervical spine level is associated with difficult direct laryngoscopy in traumatic cervical spine injury.

摘要

背景

颈椎创伤后咽后血肿可能导致危及生命的上气道梗阻及困难气道管理。本回顾性研究旨在调查咽后间隙(RPS)的扩展是否与创伤性颈椎损伤患者直接喉镜下插管困难相关。

患者与方法

回顾性纳入62例行颈椎手术全身麻醉下直接气管插管的患者。收集Cormack-Lehane(C-L)分类的喉镜分级;1级或2级归类为喉镜检查容易,而3级或4级归类为喉镜检查困难。在这些患者中,使用颈椎磁共振成像(MRI)在第2、5和7颈椎水平测量RPS厚度以及RPS与椎体的比例。比较容易和困难喉镜检查之间的RPS测量值。采用逻辑回归分析RPS测量值与困难喉镜检查之间的关系。

结果

困难喉镜检查时C2水平的RPS厚度(中位数14.29mm,四分位数间距:9.75 - 18.04)显著大于容易喉镜检查时(中位数5.10,四分位数间距:4.33 - 5.94,P<0.001)。困难喉镜检查时RPS与C2椎体的比例显著高于容易喉镜检查时(P<0.001)。RPS厚度以及RPS与椎体的比例与困难喉镜检查显著相关(OR = 2.13,95%置信区间:1.38 - 3.30;P<0.001以及OR = 1.13,95%置信区间:1.05 - 1.21;P<0.001)。

结论

上颈椎水平的RPS扩展与创伤性颈椎损伤患者直接喉镜检查困难相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/360b/6526919/d4f428e0d622/tcrm-15-669Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/360b/6526919/790faae328b7/tcrm-15-669Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/360b/6526919/b6ae5876cb73/tcrm-15-669Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/360b/6526919/d4f428e0d622/tcrm-15-669Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/360b/6526919/790faae328b7/tcrm-15-669Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/360b/6526919/b6ae5876cb73/tcrm-15-669Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/360b/6526919/d4f428e0d622/tcrm-15-669Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of difficult airway management in traumatic cervical spine injury: influence of retropharyngeal space extension.创伤性颈椎损伤中困难气道管理的预测:咽后间隙扩展的影响
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 May 17;15:669-675. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S195216. eCollection 2019.
2
Assessment of difficult laryngoscopy by electronically measured maxillo-pharyngeal angle on lateral cervical radiograph: A prospective study.通过电子测量颈椎侧位X线片上的上颌-咽角评估困难喉镜检查:一项前瞻性研究。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;4(3):158-62. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.71572.
3
ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial.经验不足的医生对颈椎固定患者进行ET-View与直接喉镜检查的比较:一项随机交叉人体模型试验。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(4):274-282. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2017.0047. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in the prone position following traumatic thoracic spine injury.创伤性胸椎损伤后俯卧位直接喉镜检查及气管插管
J Anesth. 2008;22(2):170-2. doi: 10.1007/s00540-007-0596-9. Epub 2008 May 25.
5
Evaluation of two neck ultrasound measurements as predictors of difficult direct laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study.评估两种颈部超声测量作为困难直接喉镜检查预测因素的前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):605-612. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000832.
6
Preoperative X-ray CCAR is applicable for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spondylosis.术前 X 射线颈椎张口位适用于预测颈椎病患者的喉镜检查困难。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01335-4.
7
A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.麦格拉斯MAC®喉镜与标准直接喉镜在模拟颈椎固定小儿插管中的比较:一项人体模型研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jun;176(6):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2909-9. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
8
Usefulness of Ultrasound View of Larynx in Pre-Anesthetic Airway Assessment: A Comparison With Cormack-Lehane Classification During Direct Laryngoscopy.超声观察喉部在麻醉前气道评估中的应用价值:与直接喉镜检查时的Cormack-Lehane分级比较
Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Aug 15;6(6):e39566. doi: 10.5812/aapm.39566. eCollection 2016 Dec.
9
Assessment of the storz video Macintosh laryngoscope for use in difficult airways: A human simulator study.评估史托斯视频麦克intosh 喉镜在困难气道中的应用:一项人体模拟器研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17(10):1134-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00867.x.
10
Anatomical location of the vocal cords in relation to cervical vertebrae: A new predictor of difficult laryngoscopy?声带相对于颈椎的解剖位置:困难喉镜检查的新预测指标?
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Apr;33(4):257-62. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000430.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological indicators and a novel combined predictive model for anticipating difficult laryngoscopy in cervical spondylosis patients: a prospective cohort study.预测颈椎病患者喉镜检查困难的放射学指标及一种新型联合预测模型:一项前瞻性队列研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02826-w.
2
Identification of difficult laryngoscopy using an optimized hybrid architecture.利用优化的混合架构识别困难喉镜检查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02115-z.
3
Expert consensus on difficult airway assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
Airway Management Practice in Adults With an Unstable Cervical Spine: The Harborview Medical Center Experience.成人不稳定颈椎气道管理实践: Harborview 医疗中心经验。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Aug;127(2):450-454. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003374.
2
Comparison of the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endobronchial tube intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization: A randomized controlled trial.麦格拉斯视频喉镜与麦金托什喉镜在手法直线固定患者双腔支气管导管插管中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(10):e0081. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010081.
3
困难气道评估专家共识
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Aug 1;12(4):545-566. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-46. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
Case Report of the Unusual Presentation of Stridor in an Elderly Patient Following a Cervical Fracture.老年患者颈椎骨折后出现喘鸣的罕见病例报告。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Jan 15;5(1):V15-V19. doi: 10.21980/J8V926. eCollection 2020 Jan.
5
Radiological indicators to predict the application of assistant intubation techniques for patients undergoing cervical surgery.预测颈椎手术患者辅助插管技术应用的影像学指标。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01153-0.
6
A new simple score for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: the EL.GA+ score.一种新的用于预测困难喉镜检查的简单评分:EL.GA+ 评分。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(3):206-214. doi: 10.5114/ait.2020.97775.
Risk Vessels of Retropharyngeal Hematoma During Stellate Ganglion Block.
颈后血肿行星状神经节阻滞的风险血管。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):778-781. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000644.
4
Airway and circulatory collapse due to retropharyngeal hematoma after blunt vertebral artery injury.钝性椎动脉损伤后因咽后血肿导致气道和循环系统崩溃。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May;35(5):806.e5-806.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
Comparison of intubation times using a manikin with an immobilized cervical spine: Macintosh laryngoscope vs. GlideScope vs. fiberoptic bronchoscope.使用颈椎固定的人体模型比较插管时间:麦金托什喉镜与可视喉镜与纤维支气管镜。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 28;2(4):244-249. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.043. eCollection 2015 Dec.
6
C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.急诊室中C-MAC视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于快速顺序插管的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;33(12):943-948. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000525.
7
Airway obstruction and neurogenic shock due to severe cervical spine injury.
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):196.e1-196.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.108. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
8
Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation in cadavers-effect of severe distractive-flexion injury on C3-4 motion.气管插管生物力学:尸体气管插管过程中的喉镜用力与颈椎运动——严重牵张屈曲损伤对C3 - 4运动的影响
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Nov;25(5):545-555. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE1640. Epub 2016 May 27.
9
Anatomical location of the vocal cords in relation to cervical vertebrae: A new predictor of difficult laryngoscopy?声带相对于颈椎的解剖位置:困难喉镜检查的新预测指标?
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Apr;33(4):257-62. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000430.
10
Life-Threatening Retropharyngeal Hemorrhage Secondary to Rupture of the Inferior Thyroid Artery.甲状腺下动脉破裂继发危及生命的咽后出血
Case Rep Emerg Med. 2015;2015:789076. doi: 10.1155/2015/789076. Epub 2015 Dec 24.