Yonsei Institute of Sports Science and Exercise Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Jun 1;18(2):376-383. eCollection 2019 Jun.
The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare different brands of forearm, shin, hand and foot protective equipment used in Taekwondo. The most popular brands of large forearm, shin, hand and foot protectors (D, A, K ), approved by the World Taekwondo and Korean Taekwondo Association, were examined. A drop test was used to test the protective equipment using impact levels of 3J, 9J, 12J and 15J for the forearm and shin guards, and 3J and 9J for the hand and foot protectors. The protective equipment was hit ten times from each of the designated drop heights. The drop test is described in the European standards manual of protective equipment for martial arts (SRPS EN 13277-2). The maximum force (MF) and impulse were lowest for brand K (2610.3 ± 1474.1 N), and brand A (9.6 ± 3.1 Ns), respectively, for the forearm guards; for brand A (2053.4 ± 1267.1 N) and brand K (9.8 ± 3.5 Ns), respectively, for the shin guards; for brand K (4486.5 ± 1718.4 N), and brand A (6.3 ± 1.1 Ns), respectively for the hand protectors; and for brand A (3733.7 ± 2465.3 N), and brand D (6.8 ± 0.6 Ns), respectively, for the foot protectors. For the forearm guard brand and impact level, there was a significant interaction effect for the MF (F=42.44, η=.677, p <0.001) and impulse (F = 33.97, η = 0.626, p <0.001). Based on the MF, brand K performed the best for the forearm guards and hand protectors, and brand A, for the shin guards and foot protectors. The best results for the impulse were for brand A (forearm guards and hand protectors), brand K (shin guards) and brand D (foot protectors).
本研究旨在评估和比较跆拳道中使用的不同品牌的前臂、小腿、手部和脚部防护装备。检查了世界跆拳道联盟和韩国跆拳道协会批准的大型前臂、小腿、手部和脚部防护装备(D、A、K)的最受欢迎品牌。使用冲击水平为 3J、9J、12J 和 15J 的落锤试验测试防护装备,手部和脚部防护装备的冲击水平为 3J 和 9J。从每个指定的落锤高度对防护装备进行了十次撞击。落锤试验在欧洲武术防护装备标准手册(SRPS EN 13277-2)中有描述。对于前臂护具,品牌 K(2610.3 ± 1474.1 N)和品牌 A(9.6 ± 3.1 Ns)的最大力(MF)和冲量最低;对于小腿护具,品牌 A(2053.4 ± 1267.1 N)和品牌 K(9.8 ± 3.5 Ns)的 MF 和冲量最低;对于手部护具,品牌 K(4486.5 ± 1718.4 N)和品牌 A(6.3 ± 1.1 Ns)的 MF 和冲量最低;对于脚部护具,品牌 A(3733.7 ± 2465.3 N)和品牌 D(6.8 ± 0.6 Ns)的 MF 和冲量最低。对于前臂护具品牌和冲击水平,MF(F=42.44,η=.677,p<0.001)和冲量(F=33.97,η=0.626,p<0.001)均存在显著的交互效应。基于 MF,品牌 K 在前臂护具和手部护具方面表现最佳,品牌 A 在小腿护具和脚部护具方面表现最佳。冲量的最佳结果为品牌 A(前臂护具和手部护具)、品牌 K(小腿护具)和品牌 D(脚部护具)。