Department of Physical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
International Olympic Committee Research Centre Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Technol Health Care. 2021;29(4):667-675. doi: 10.3233/THC-202598.
This study aims to compare and analyze the difference of impact force attenuation according to size and impact location on a Taekwondo body protector.
Body protectors sized 1 to 5, were impact tested by equipment based on the specifications in the European standard manual (EN 13277-1, 3). The impactor release heights were set to match impact energies of 3 and 15 J. The impactor was made from a 2.5 kg cylindrically cut piece of aluminum. Each body protector was impacted 10 times at the two impact energies and two locations. The differences in performance for each body protector size were compared using a two-way analysis of variance with a significance level of p< 005. The effect sizes were investigated using a partial eta squared value (η2).
The significant mean differences between the body protector size and impact area (p< 005) and the average impact time of impact strengths 3 and 15 J were 0.0017 and 0.0012 s, respectively In addition, when an impact strength of 15 J was applied, the maximum resulting impact force exceeded 2000 N for both locations on all sizes. Furthermore, at an impact strength of 3 J size 3 significantly reduced the impact force more than the other sizes; however, size 1 showed the greatest shock absorption at an impact of 15 J.
The results of this study show that the shock absorption of body protectors does not increase according to size; i.e., a larger body protector does not reduce the impact load more effectively. To improve safety performance, we recommend a maximum impact force of 2000 N or less for all body protectors.
本研究旨在比较和分析跆拳道护具在不同尺寸和冲击位置时冲击力衰减的差异。
根据欧洲标准手册(EN 13277-1、3)的规格,使用设备对 1 号至 5 号护具进行冲击测试。冲击器释放高度设置为匹配 3J 和 15J 的冲击能。冲击器由 2.5 公斤的圆柱形铝块制成。每个护具在两种冲击能和两种位置各冲击 10 次。使用具有显著水平 p<005 的双向方差分析比较每个护具尺寸的性能差异。使用偏 eta 平方值(η2)研究效应大小。
护具尺寸和冲击区域之间的平均差异有统计学意义(p<005),冲击强度为 3J 和 15J 的平均冲击时间差异分别为 0.0017s 和 0.0012s。此外,当冲击强度为 15J 时,所有尺寸在两个位置的最大冲击力均超过 2000N。此外,在冲击强度为 3J 时,尺寸 3 比其他尺寸更能显著减小冲击力;然而,在冲击强度为 15J 时,尺寸 1 的减震效果最大。
本研究结果表明,护具的减震效果并非随尺寸增大而增加,即较大的护具并不能更有效地降低冲击负荷。为了提高安全性能,我们建议所有护具的最大冲击力应不超过 2000N。