Rudner Mary, Danielsson Henrik, Lyxell Björn, Lunner Thomas, Rönnberg Jerker
Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 28;10:1149. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01149. eCollection 2019.
Adults with poorer peripheral hearing have slower phonological processing speed measured using visual rhyme tasks, and it has been suggested that this is due to fading of phonological representations stored in long-term memory. Representations of both vowels and consonants are likely to be important for determining whether or not two printed words rhyme. However, it is not known whether the relation between phonological processing speed and hearing loss is specific to the lower frequency ranges which characterize vowels or higher frequency ranges that characterize consonants. We tested the visual rhyme ability of 212 adults with hearing loss. As in previous studies, we found that rhyme judgments were slower and less accurate when there was a mismatch between phonological and orthographic information. A substantial portion of the variance in the speed of making correct rhyme judgment decisions was explained by lexical access speed. Reading span, a measure of working memory, explained further variance in match but not mismatch conditions, but no additional variance was explained by auditory variables. This pattern of findings suggests possible reliance on a lexico-semantic word-matching strategy for solving the rhyme judgment task. Future work should investigate the relation between adoption of a lexico-semantic strategy during phonological processing tasks and hearing aid outcome.
外周听力较差的成年人在使用视觉押韵任务测量时,语音处理速度较慢,有人认为这是由于长期记忆中存储的语音表征逐渐消退所致。元音和辅音的表征对于确定两个印刷单词是否押韵可能都很重要。然而,尚不清楚语音处理速度与听力损失之间的关系是否特定于表征元音的低频范围或表征辅音的高频范围。我们测试了212名听力损失成年人的视觉押韵能力。与之前的研究一样,我们发现当语音信息与正字法信息不匹配时,押韵判断会更慢且更不准确。做出正确押韵判断决策的速度差异的很大一部分是由词汇通达速度解释的。阅读广度是工作记忆的一种测量方法,它解释了匹配条件下的进一步差异,但在不匹配条件下没有,而且听觉变量没有解释额外的差异。这种研究结果模式表明,在解决押韵判断任务时可能依赖词汇语义单词匹配策略。未来的工作应该研究在语音处理任务中采用词汇语义策略与助听器效果之间的关系。