LVIS与Enterprise支架用于中型颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的疗效:血流动力学对比研究
Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Hemodynamic Comparison Study.
作者信息
Li Wenqiang, Wang Yang, Zhang Yisen, Wang Kun, Zhang Ying, Tian Zhongbin, Yang Xinjian, Liu Jian
机构信息
Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
出版信息
Front Neurol. 2019 May 28;10:522. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00522. eCollection 2019.
We conducted a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study and compared the treatment of medium-sized intracranial aneurysms with LVIS and Enterprise stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) to determine the effects of hemodynamic changes caused by different stent and coil packing densities (PDs) in endovascular treatment. We enrolled 87 consecutive patients, with 87 medium-sized intracranial aneurysms (≥7, ≤ 12 mm), who underwent LVIS or Enterprise SACE. Aneurysms treated with LVIS SACE were allocated to the LVIS group, and the remainder were allocated to the Enterprise group. CFD were performed to assess hemodynamic alterations between before treatment, after stent deployment, and after SACE. One aneurysm recanalized in the LVIS group ( = 42), and five recanalized in the Enterprise group ( = 45) (recanalization rate: 2.4 vs. 11.1%, respectively; = 0.108). Higher complete obliteration rate ( = 0.069) was found in the LVIS group. Velocity at the neck plane showed a greater reduction ratio than velocity and WSS of the aneurysm in both groups after stent deployment, while velocity and WSS of the aneurysm showed a greater reduction ratio after coil placement. Further, there was a greater reduction in velocity at the neck plane (59.52 vs. 39.81%), aneurysmal velocity (88.46 vs. 69.45%), and wall shear stress (WSS) (85.45 vs. 69.49%) on the aneurysm in the LVIS group ( < 0.001 for all). Specifically, the reduction ratio of velocity at the neck plane showed significant difference between the groups in the multivariate analysis ( = 0.013). LVIS SACE showed a lower recanalization for endovascular treatment of medium-sized intracranial aneurysms, and the greater hemodynamic alterations might be the key factors.
我们进行了一项计算流体动力学(CFD)研究,比较了使用LVIS和Enterprise支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SACE)治疗中型颅内动脉瘤的情况,以确定血管内治疗中不同支架和弹簧圈填充密度(PDs)引起的血流动力学变化的影响。我们连续纳入了87例患者,这些患者有87个中型颅内动脉瘤(≥7mm,≤12mm),接受了LVIS或Enterprise SACE治疗。接受LVIS SACE治疗的动脉瘤被分配到LVIS组,其余的被分配到Enterprise组。进行CFD以评估治疗前、支架置入后和SACE后之间的血流动力学改变。LVIS组有1个动脉瘤再通(n = 42),Enterprise组有5个动脉瘤再通(n = 45)(再通率分别为2.4%和11.1%;P = 0.108)。LVIS组的完全闭塞率更高(P = 0.069)。在两组中,支架置入后,颈部平面的速度显示出比动脉瘤的速度和壁面切应力(WSS)更大的降低率,而在弹簧圈置入后,动脉瘤的速度和WSS显示出更大的降低率。此外,LVIS组中动脉瘤颈部平面的速度(59.52%对39.81%)、动脉瘤速度(88.46%对69.45%)和壁面切应力(WSS)(85.45%对69.49%)的降低幅度更大(所有P均<0.001)。具体而言,在多变量分析中,颈部平面速度的降低率在两组之间显示出显著差异(P = 0.013)。对于中型颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗,LVIS SACE显示出较低的再通率,更大的血流动力学改变可能是关键因素。
相似文献
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020-7
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019-3-5
World Neurosurg. 2016-7
引用本文的文献
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2025-6
J Clin Med. 2020-12-7
本文引用的文献
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017-12-19
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017-6
World Neurosurg. 2016-7
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016-10