Jamil Muhammad Ahmer, Sharma Amit, Nuesgen Nicole, Pezeshkpoor Behnaz, Heimbach André, Pavlova Anne, Oldenburg Johannes, El-Maarri Osman
Institute of Experimental Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Institute of Human Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Bonn - University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Front Genet. 2019 May 29;10:508. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00508. eCollection 2019.
Diverse DNA structural variations (SVs) in human cancers and several other diseases are well documented. For genomic inversions in particular, the disease causing mechanism may not be clear, especially if the inversion border does not cross a coding sequence. Understanding about the molecular processes of these inverted genomic sequences, in a mainly epigenetic context, may provide additional information regarding sequence-specific regulation of gene expression in human diseases. Herein, we study one such inversion hotspot at Xq28, which leads to the disruption of F8 gene and results in hemophilia A phenotype. To determine the epigenetic consequence of this rearrangement, we evaluated DNA methylation levels of 12 CpG rich regions with the coverage of 550 kb by using bisulfite-pyrosequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based bisulfite re-sequencing enrichment assay. Our results show that this inversion prone area harbors widespread methylation changes at the studied regions. However, only 5/12 regions showed significant methylation changes, specifically in case of intron 1 inversion (two regions), intron 22 inversion (two regions) and one common region in both inversions. Interestingly, these aberrant methylated regions were found to be overlapping with the inversion proximities. In addition, two CpG sites reached 100% sensitivity and specificity to discriminate wild type from intron 22 and intron 1 inversion samples. While we found age to be an influencing factor on methylation levels at some regions, covariate analysis still confirms the differential methylation induced by inversion, regardless of age. The hemophilia A methylation inversion "HAMI" assay provides an advantage over conventional PCR-based methods, which may not detect novel rare genomic rearrangements. Taken together, we showed that genomic inversions in the F8 (Xq28) region are associated with detectable changes in methylation levels and can be used as an epigenetic diagnostic marker.
人类癌症和其他几种疾病中存在多种DNA结构变异(SVs),这已得到充分记录。特别是对于基因组倒位,其致病机制可能并不明确,尤其是当倒位边界未跨越编码序列时。在主要的表观遗传背景下,了解这些倒置基因组序列的分子过程,可能会提供有关人类疾病中基因表达的序列特异性调控的更多信息。在此,我们研究了Xq28处的一个此类倒位热点,它导致F8基因破坏并导致A型血友病表型。为了确定这种重排的表观遗传后果,我们使用亚硫酸氢盐焦磷酸测序和基于新一代测序(NGS)的亚硫酸氢盐重测序富集分析,评估了12个富含CpG区域(覆盖550 kb)的DNA甲基化水平。我们的结果表明,这个易于发生倒位的区域在所研究的区域中存在广泛的甲基化变化。然而,只有5/12的区域显示出显著的甲基化变化,特别是在1号内含子倒位(两个区域)、22号内含子倒位(两个区域)以及两种倒位中一个共同区域的情况下。有趣的是,这些异常甲基化区域被发现与倒位附近区域重叠。此外,两个CpG位点在区分野生型与22号内含子和1号内含子倒位样本时,灵敏度和特异性均达到100%。虽然我们发现年龄是某些区域甲基化水平的一个影响因素,但协变量分析仍然证实了倒位诱导的差异甲基化,与年龄无关。A型血友病甲基化倒位“HAMI”检测比传统的基于PCR的方法具有优势,后者可能无法检测到新的罕见基因组重排。综上所述,我们表明F8(Xq28)区域的基因组倒位与可检测到的甲基化水平变化相关,并且可以用作表观遗传诊断标志物。