Taksler Glen B, Beth Mercer Mary, Fagerlin Angela, Rothberg Michael B
Medicine Institute, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Office of Patient Experience, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 May 27;4(1):2381468319850803. doi: 10.1177/2381468319850803. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
Few Americans obtain all 41 guideline-recommended preventive services for nonpregnant adults. We assessed patient interest in prioritizing their preventive care needs. We conducted a mixed-methods study, with 4 focus groups ( = 28) at a single institution and a nationwide survey ( = 2,103). Participants were middle-aged and older adults with preventive care needs. We obtained reactions to written materials describing the magnitude of benefit from major preventive services, including both absolute and relative benefits. Recommendations were individualized for patient risk factors ("individualized preventive care recommendations"). Focus groups assessed patient interest, how patients would want to discuss individualized recommendations with their providers, and potential for individualized recommendations to influence patient decision making. Survey content was based on focus groups and analyzed with logistic regression. Patients expressed strong interest in individualized recommendations. Among survey respondents, an adjusted 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.7% to 89.7%) found individualized recommendations very easy to understand, 77.2% (95% CI = 75.3% to 79.1%) considered them very useful, and 64.9% (95% CI = 62.8% to 67.0%) highly trustworthy (each ≥6/7 on Likert scale). Three quarters of participants wanted to receive their own individualized recommendations in upcoming primary care visits (adjusted proportion = 77.5%, 95% CI = 75.6% to 79.4%). Both focus group and survey participants supported shared decision making and reported that individualized recommendations would improve motivation to obtain preventive care. Half of survey respondents reported that they would be much more likely to visit their doctor if they knew individualized recommendations would be discussed, compared with 4.2% who would not be more likely to visit their doctor. Survey respondents already prioritized preventive services, stating they were most likely to choose quick/easy preventive services and least likely to choose expensive preventive services (adjusted proportions, 63.8% and 8.5%, respectively). Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses. Individualized preventive care recommendations are likely to be well received in primary care and might motivate patients to improve adherence to evidence-based care.
很少有美国人能接受针对非孕期成年人的所有41项指南推荐的预防性服务。我们评估了患者对优先满足其预防性护理需求的兴趣。我们开展了一项混合方法研究,在一家机构进行了4个焦点小组访谈(n = 28),并开展了一项全国性调查(n = 2103)。参与者为有预防性护理需求的中老年人。我们获取了他们对描述主要预防性服务获益程度的书面材料的反应,包括绝对获益和相对获益。根据患者的风险因素给出个性化建议(“个性化预防性护理建议”)。焦点小组评估了患者的兴趣、患者希望如何与医护人员讨论个性化建议,以及个性化建议影响患者决策的可能性。调查内容基于焦点小组访谈结果,并采用逻辑回归进行分析。患者对个性化建议表现出浓厚兴趣。在调查受访者中,经调整后,88.2%(95%置信区间[CI] = 86.7%至89.7%)的人认为个性化建议非常容易理解,77.2%(95% CI = 75.3%至79.1%)的人认为非常有用,64.9%(95% CI = 62.8%至67.0%)的人高度信任(李克特量表上每项均≥6/7)。四分之三的参与者希望在即将到来的初级保健就诊中收到自己的个性化建议(经调整比例 = 77.5%,95% CI = 75.6%至79.4%)。焦点小组和调查参与者都支持共同决策,并表示个性化建议会提高接受预防性护理的积极性。一半的调查受访者表示,如果他们知道会讨论个性化建议,那么他们去看医生的可能性会大大增加,相比之下,4.2%的人表示不会更有可能去看医生。调查受访者已经对预防性服务进行了优先排序,称他们最有可能选择快速/简单的预防性服务,最不可能选择昂贵的预防性服务(经调整比例分别为63.8%和8.5%)。敏感性分析结果一致。个性化预防性护理建议在初级保健中可能会受到好评,并可能促使患者提高对循证护理的依从性。