Suppr超能文献

患者接受预防保健服务的数量与预防保健指南数量之间的关系。

Association Between Number of Preventive Care Guidelines and Preventive Care Utilization by Patients.

机构信息

Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 May 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The number of preventive care guidelines is rapidly increasing. It is unknown whether the number of guideline-recommended preventive services is associated with utilization.

METHODS

The authors used Poisson regression of 390,778 person-years of electronic medical records data from 2008 to 2015, in 80,773 individuals aged 50-75 years. Analyses considered eligibility for 11 preventive services most closely associated with guidelines: tobacco cessation; control of obesity, hypertension, lipids, or blood glucose; influenza vaccination; and screening for breast, cervical, or colorectal cancers, abdominal aortic aneurysm, or osteoporosis. The outcome was the rate of preventive care utilization over the following year. Results were adjusted for demographics and stratified by the number of disease risk factors (smoking, obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes). Data were collected in 2016 and analyzed in 2017.

RESULTS

Preventive care utilization was lower when the number of guideline-recommended preventive services was higher. The adjusted rate of preventive care utilization decreased from 38.67 per 100 (95% CI=38.16, 39.18) in patients eligible for one guideline-recommended service to 31.59 per 100 (95% CI=31.29, 31.89) in patients eligible for two services and 25.43 per 100 (95% CI=24.68, 26.18) in patients eligible for six or more services (p-trend<0.001). Results were robust to disease risk factors and observed for all but two services (tobacco cessation, obesity reduction). However, for any given number of guideline-recommended services, patients with more disease risk factors had higher utilization rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of preventive care utilization was lower when the number of guideline-recommended services was higher. Prioritizing recommendations might improve utilization of high-value services.

摘要

引言

预防保健指南的数量正在迅速增加。目前尚不清楚指南推荐的预防服务数量是否与利用率相关。

方法

作者使用了 2008 年至 2015 年间 80773 名 50-75 岁个体的 390778 人年电子病历数据,采用泊松回归分析。分析考虑了与指南最密切相关的 11 种预防服务的资格:戒烟;控制肥胖、高血压、血脂或血糖;流感疫苗接种;以及乳腺癌、宫颈癌或结直肠癌、腹主动脉瘤或骨质疏松症筛查。结果为次年预防保健服务利用率。结果通过人口统计学进行调整,并按吸烟、肥胖、高血压、高血脂、糖尿病等疾病风险因素的数量进行分层。数据于 2016 年收集,并于 2017 年进行分析。

结果

当指南推荐的预防服务数量较高时,预防保健服务的利用率较低。调整后的预防保健服务利用率从符合一项指南推荐服务的患者的 38.67/100(95%CI=38.16, 39.18)下降到符合两项服务的患者的 31.59/100(95%CI=31.29, 31.89),符合六项或更多服务的患者的 25.43/100(95%CI=24.68, 26.18)(p-trend<0.001)。结果在考虑疾病风险因素后仍然稳健,除了两种服务(戒烟、减肥)之外,在其他所有服务中均得到了观察。然而,对于任何给定数量的指南推荐服务,具有更多疾病风险因素的患者具有更高的利用率。

结论

当指南推荐的服务数量较高时,预防保健服务的利用率较低。优先考虑建议可能会提高高价值服务的利用率。

相似文献

1
Association Between Number of Preventive Care Guidelines and Preventive Care Utilization by Patients.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 May 14.
2
Patient-provider communication and timely receipt of preventive services.
Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):658-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.034. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
4
Association between maternal preventive care utilization and adolescent vaccination: it's not just about Pap testing.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014 Feb;27(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
5
Use of Preventive Health Services Among Cancer Survivors in the U.S.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6):830-838. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
6
8
Equity in prevention and health care.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jul;56(7):510-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.7.510.
9
Association between health insurance coverage of office visit and cancer screening among women.
Med Care. 2002 Nov;40(11):1060-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200211000-00007.
10
Does time pressure create barriers for people to receive preventive health services?
Prev Med. 2015 May;74:55-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

2
Sex and income inequalities in preventive services in diabetes.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2159941. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2159941.
4
Periodic screening for breast and cervical cancer in women with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Feb;33(2):249-259. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01517-y. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
5
Modeling Strategies to Optimize Cancer Screening in USPSTF Guideline-Noncompliant Women.
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):885-894. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0952.
6
Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Diabetologia. 2020 Jan;63(1):34-48. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-04995-7. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
7
Assessing Patient Interest in Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations.
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 May 27;4(1):2381468319850803. doi: 10.1177/2381468319850803. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated Priorities Among Effective Clinical Preventive Services.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jan;15(1):14-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.2017. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
Strategies to Prioritize Clinical Options in Primary Care.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jan;15(1):10-13. doi: 10.1370/afm.2027. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
3
Preventive Interventions: An Immediate Priority.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jan;15(1):8-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.2026. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
4
Prevention Priorities: Guidance for Value-Driven Health Improvement.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jan;15(1):6-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.2023. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
5
Paid sick leave and preventive health care service use among U.S. working adults.
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Evidence-Based Guideline: The USPSTF recommends screening for colorectal cancer in adults 50 to 75 years of age.
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 20;165(6):JC26. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2016-165-6-026.
9
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Clinical Decision Support Systems Recommended to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):796-799. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.041.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验