Suppr超能文献

探讨剖宫产术后阴道分娩风险计算器评估对剖宫产术后试产咨询的影响。

Examining the Impact of the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Risk Calculator Estimation on Trial of Labor After Cesarean Counseling.

作者信息

Jeffries Erin, Falcone-Wharton Amy, Daggy Joanne, Tucker Edmonds Brownsyne

机构信息

Department of OB/GYN, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2019 May 27;4(1):2381468319850830. doi: 10.1177/2381468319850830. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.

Abstract

Because failed trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) is associated with greater morbidity than planned cesarean, it is important to distinguish women with a high likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) from those likely to fail. The VBAC Calculator may help make this distinction but little is known about how often providers use it; nor whether use improves risk estimation and/or influences TOLAC counseling. In a cross-sectional survey, a convenience sample of obstetrical providers reported their likelihood (4-point Likert-type scale) to "Recommend,""Offer," or "Agree to" TOLAC for patients presented first through five clinical vignettes; then, in different order, by corresponding VBAC calculator estimates. Of the 85 (of 101, 84% response rate) participants, 88% routinely performed TOLAC, but only 21% used the Calculator. The majority (67.1% to 89.3%) overestimated the likelihood of success for all but one vignette (which had the highest estimate of success). Most providers (42% to 89%) recommended TOLAC for all five vignettes. Given calculated estimates, the majority of providers (67% to 95%) recommended TOLAC for success estimates exceeding 40%. For estimates between 20% and 40%, most providers offered (58%) or agreed (68%) to TOLAC; and even below 20%, over half still agreed to TOLAC. The vignette with the lowest estimate of success (18.7%) had the weakest intraprovider agreement (kappa = 0.116; confidence interval [CI] = 0.045-0.187), whereas the strongest agreement was found in the two vignettes with highest success estimates: 77.9% (kappa = 0.549; CI = 0.382-0.716) and 96.6% (kappa = 0.527; CI = 0.284-0.770). Survey responses may not reflect actual practice patterns. Providers are overly optimistic in their clinical estimation of VBAC success. Wider use of decision support could aid in risk stratification and TOLAC counseling to reduce patient morbidity.

摘要

由于剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)失败比计划剖宫产的发病率更高,因此区分剖宫产术后阴道分娩成功可能性高的女性和可能失败的女性非常重要。VBAC计算器可能有助于做出这种区分,但对于医疗服务提供者使用它的频率知之甚少;也不清楚使用它是否能改善风险评估和/或影响TOLAC咨询。在一项横断面调查中,一个由产科医疗服务提供者组成的便利样本报告了他们对于通过五个临床病例首次呈现的患者“推荐”“提供”或“同意”TOLAC的可能性(4点李克特量表);然后,按不同顺序,根据相应的VBAC计算器估计值进行报告。在101名参与者中有85名(回复率84%),88%的人常规进行TOLAC,但只有21%的人使用了计算器。除了一个成功率估计最高的病例外,大多数人(67.1%至89.3%)高估了所有病例成功的可能性。大多数医疗服务提供者(42%至89%)对所有五个病例都推荐了TOLAC。根据计算出的估计值,大多数医疗服务提供者(67%至95%)对成功率估计超过40%的情况推荐了TOLAC。对于2

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91c8/6540508/98673f7b2177/10.1177_2381468319850830-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the Impact of the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Risk Calculator Estimation on Trial of Labor After Cesarean Counseling.
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 May 27;4(1):2381468319850830. doi: 10.1177/2381468319850830. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
2
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
3
Correlates of Trial of Labor and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;28(9):1302-1312. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7270. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
4
[Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 25;54(6):369-374. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.06.003.
5
Validation of a prediction model for predicting the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labour in Quebec.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Sep;34(9):820-825. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35379-8.
6
Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;213(6):861.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.064. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
8
Applying a Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean to a Latina Inner-City Population.
AJP Rep. 2020 Apr;10(2):e148-e154. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708493. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
9
Prediction of vaginal birth after one ceasarean delivery for non-progressive labor.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jan;297(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4569-4. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
10
Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):492.e1-492.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.232. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

3
Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: a systematic review.
BJOG. 2013 Feb;120(3):257-66. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12060. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
4
Decision aid tools to support women's decision making in pregnancy and birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(12):1968-78. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.041. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
5
Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality.
Clin Perinatol. 2011 Jun;38(2):297-309. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.012.
7
Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Nov;26(10):693-701. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1239494. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
9
Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences.
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;112(4):913-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181888fd8.
10
Perinatal outcomes after successful and failed trials of labor after cesarean delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):583.e1-5; discussion 583.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验