Suppr超能文献

使用两种 pH 值不同的 HP 产品进行为期一年的漂白效果:一项双盲随机临床试验。

One-year bleaching efficacy using two HP products with different pH: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Sep;31(5):493-499. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12505. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This split-mouth, double-blind, randomized clinical trial evaluated the 1-year bleaching efficacy produced by two hydrogen peroxide gels with different pHs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were divided into two groups corresponding to two different products: Pola Office (pH = 2.0/SDI) and Pola Office Plus (pH = 7.0/SDI). The treatment was assessed during and after the bleaching procedure up to 12 months post-treatment. The assessment consisted of two bleaching scales shade guide units (ΔSGU) and spectrophotometric device (ΔE, ΔE00, and Whiteness Index) of both maxillary quadrants. Results for ΔSGUs in both scales and ΔE00 and Whiteness Index were compared using Mann Whitney test and ΔE measurements through the t-Student test for paired samples in each evaluation time. The color rebound (1- vs 12-month postbleaching data) was evaluated with Wilcoxon test (alpha = .05).

RESULTS

During the different times of evaluation, the color variation was similar for both products (P > .05), both for subjective (ΔSGUs) and objective assessments (ΔE, ΔE00, and Whiteness Index). Also, both products showed a slight rebound after 12-month postbleaching (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Concerning the stability of color, in-office dental whitening with two hydrogen peroxide gels of different pHs produced similar results, with no significant of regression, for 12 months postwhitening.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Bleaching using a neutral (pH = 7.0) in-office gel demonstrated similar stability and rebound effect than an acidic one (pH = 2.0).

摘要

目的

本裂口、双盲、随机临床试验评估了两种 pH 值不同的过氧化氢凝胶在 1 年漂白效果。

材料和方法

28 名患者分为两组,对应两种不同产品:Pola Office(pH=2.0/SDI)和 Pola Office Plus(pH=7.0/SDI)。在治疗过程中和治疗后至治疗后 12 个月评估治疗效果。评估包括两个漂白量表比色单位(ΔSGU)和分光光度仪(ΔE、ΔE00 和白度指数)的上颌四个象限。两种比色尺的 ΔSGU 以及 ΔE00 和白度指数的结果使用 Mann-Whitney 检验进行比较,在每个评估时间点通过 t-Student 检验对配对样本的 ΔE 测量值进行比较。颜色反弹(1 个月与 12 个月后漂白数据)用 Wilcoxon 检验(α=0.05)。

结果

在不同的评估时间,两种产品的颜色变化相似(P>0.05),包括主观(ΔSGU)和客观评估(ΔE、ΔE00 和白度指数)。此外,两种产品在 12 个月后漂白后都显示出轻微的反弹(P>0.05)。

结论

关于颜色稳定性,使用两种不同 pH 值的过氧化氢凝胶进行诊室漂白,在漂白后 12 个月内,结果相似,没有明显的回归。

临床意义

使用中性(pH=7.0)诊室凝胶漂白显示出与酸性凝胶(pH=2.0)相似的稳定性和反弹效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验