Gallagher Sidhbh, Rahmani Farrah, Russell Arielle, Duquette Stephen
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;83(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001810.
One of the most common surgical procedures for gender affirmation surgery of the chest is mastectomy. The aims of this article are to review the outcomes of a single surgeon's experience with a drainless technique, which we named "masculoplasty" and compare morbidity in this group to previously published outcomes where drains were used.
A retrospective chart review was undertaken of all patients presenting to a single surgeon for gender-affirming chest surgery. A literature review was completed, compiling data from previously published studies of mastectomy with free nipple graft for the transgender patient. Outcomes of this drain-free group were compared with historical data, where drains were known to have been used.
One hundred fifty-three patients underwent 306 masculoplasties in a university teaching hospital. The mean age of patients was 30 years (17-66 years). Sixty-five (42%) had 1 or more chronic medical comorbidities with 17 diabetic patients (11%). The mean body mass index was 32 kg/m (18-57 kg/m), and 83 (54%) were obese. Forty-two (27%) of the patients had a history of smoking. Mean operative time was 136 minutes (74-266 minutes).Hematoma occurred in 1 patient (0.3%). Infections occurred in 7 masculoplasties (2%) with wound dehiscence in 3 (1%). Two masculoplasties (0.7%) had partial nipple necrosis. Two patients (0.7%) developed a symptomatic pneumothorax. There were 0 seromas, and no procedures were performed to drain fluid. Eight masculoplasties (3%) underwent secondary corrections. Median follow-up was 9 months.Outcomes from this drain-free technique were compared with previously published outcomes of mastectomy where drains were known to be used. When compared with previously published series (n = 1334), the drain-free group had statistically significantly lower rates of hematoma (1/306 vs 39/1334, P = 0.0036) and acute reoperation (1/306 vs 42/1334, P = 0.0024). There was a shorter length of hospital stay in the drain-free group with a statistically significantly lower revision rate (8/306 vs 116/1334, P = 0.0001).
Gender affirmation chest surgery can be safely offered using a drain-free or "masculoplasty" technique. Compared with historical data, the use of progressive tension sutures decreases the incidence of hematoma, the need for acute reoperation, and other complications.
乳房切除术是胸部性别确认手术中最常见的外科手术之一。本文旨在回顾一位外科医生采用无引流技术(我们称之为“男性化整形术”)的经验结果,并将该组的发病率与先前发表的使用引流的结果进行比较。
对一位外科医生进行的所有性别确认胸部手术患者进行回顾性病历审查。完成了文献综述,汇编了先前发表的关于为 transgender 患者进行带游离乳头移植乳房切除术的研究数据。将这个无引流组的结果与已知使用引流的历史数据进行比较。
在一家大学教学医院,153 名患者接受了 306 次男性化整形术。患者的平均年龄为 30 岁(17 - 66 岁)。65 名(42%)患者有一种或多种慢性疾病合并症,其中 17 名(11%)为糖尿病患者。平均体重指数为 32 kg/m²(18 - 57 kg/m²),83 名(54%)患者肥胖。42 名(27%)患者有吸烟史。平均手术时间为 136 分钟(74 - 266 分钟)。1 名患者(0.3%)发生血肿。7 次男性化整形术(2%)发生感染,3 次(1%)发生伤口裂开。2 次男性化整形术(0.7%)出现部分乳头坏死。2 名患者(0.7%)发生有症状的气胸。无血清肿,未进行引流液体的操作。8 次男性化整形术(3%)接受了二次矫正。中位随访时间为 9 个月。将这种无引流技术的结果与先前发表的已知使用引流的乳房切除术结果进行比较。与先前发表的系列研究(n = 1334)相比,无引流组的血肿发生率(1/306 对 39/1334,P = 0.0036)和急性再次手术率(1/306 对 42/1334,P = 0.0024)在统计学上显著更低。无引流组的住院时间更短,翻修率在统计学上显著更低(8/306 对 116/1334,P = 0.0001)。
使用无引流或“男性化整形术”技术可以安全地进行性别确认胸部手术。与历史数据相比,使用渐进性张力缝合可降低血肿发生率、急性再次手术的需求及其他并发症。