Cooper Crystal M, Chin Fatt Cherise R, Jha Manish, Fonzo Gregory A, Grannemann Bruce D, Carmody Thomas, Ali Aasia, Aslan Sina, Almeida Jorge R C, Deckersbach Thilo, Fava Maurizio, Kurian Benji T, McGrath Patrick J, McInnis Melvin, Parsey Ramin V, Weissman Myrna, Phillips Mary L, Lu Hanzhang, Etkin Amit, Trivedi Madhukar H
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry and behavioural Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States of America.
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 May 18;10:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.04.007. eCollection 2019 Apr.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) has been associated with brain-related changes. However, biomarkers have yet to be defined that could "accurately" identify antidepressant-responsive patterns and reduce the trial-and-error process in treatment selection. Cerebral blood perfusion, as measured by Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL), has been used to understand resting-state brain function, detect abnormalities in MDD, and could serve as a marker for treatment selection. As part of a larger trial to identify predictors of treatment outcome, the current investigation aimed to identify perfusion predictors of treatment response in MDD.
For this secondary analysis, participants include 231 individuals with MDD from the EMBARC study, a randomised, placebo-controlled trial investigating clinical, behavioural, and biological predictors of antidepressant response. Participants received sertraline (n = 114) or placebo (n = 117) and response was monitored for 8 weeks. Pre-treatment neuroimaging was completed, including ASL. A whole-brain, voxel-wise linear mixed-effects model was conducted to identify brain regions in which perfusion levels differentially predict (moderate) treatment response. Clinical effectiveness of perfusion moderators was investigated by composite moderator analysis and remission rates. Composite moderator analysis combined the effect of individual perfusion moderators and identified which contribute to sertraline or placebo as the "preferred" treatment. Remission rates were calculated for participants "accurately" treated based on the composite moderator () versus "inaccurately" treated ().
Perfusion levels in multiple brain regions differentially predicted improvement with sertraline over placebo. Of these regions, perfusion in the putamen and anterior insula, inferior temporal gyrus, fusiform, parahippocampus, inferior parietal lobule, and orbital frontal gyrus contributed to sertraline response. Remission rates increased from 37% for all those who received sertraline to 53% for those who were to have received it and sertraline was their perfusion-preferred treatment.
This large study showed that perfusion patterns in brain regions involved with reward, salience, affective, and default mode processing moderate treatment response favouring sertraline over placebo. Accurately matching patients with defined perfusion patterns could significantly increase remission rates.
National Institute of Mental Health, the Hersh Foundation, and the Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O'Donnell Brain Institute at UT Southwestern Medical Center.Trial Registration.Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care for Depression (EMARC) Registration Number: NCT01407094 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01407094).
重度抑郁症(MDD)与大脑相关变化有关。然而,尚未确定能够“准确”识别抗抑郁药反应模式并减少治疗选择中试错过程的生物标志物。通过动脉自旋标记(ASL)测量的脑血流灌注已被用于了解静息状态下的脑功能、检测MDD中的异常情况,并可作为治疗选择的标志物。作为一项更大规模试验的一部分,该试验旨在确定治疗结果的预测因素,当前的研究旨在确定MDD治疗反应的灌注预测因素。
在这项二次分析中,参与者包括来自EMBARC研究的231名MDD患者,这是一项随机、安慰剂对照试验,旨在研究抗抑郁药反应的临床、行为和生物学预测因素。参与者接受舍曲林(n = 114)或安慰剂(n = 117)治疗,并监测8周的反应。完成了治疗前的神经影像学检查,包括ASL。进行了全脑、体素水平的线性混合效应模型,以确定灌注水平差异预测(中度)治疗反应的脑区。通过复合调节因素分析和缓解率来研究灌注调节因素的临床有效性。复合调节因素分析结合了个体灌注调节因素的作用,并确定了哪些因素有助于将舍曲林或安慰剂作为“首选”治疗方法。计算基于复合调节因素“准确”治疗的参与者与“不准确”治疗的参与者的缓解率。
多个脑区的灌注水平差异预测了舍曲林比安慰剂的改善情况。在这些区域中,壳核、前岛叶、颞下回、梭状回、海马旁回、顶下小叶和眶额回的灌注有助于舍曲林反应。缓解率从所有接受舍曲林治疗的人的37%提高到那些应该接受舍曲林治疗且舍曲林是其灌注首选治疗方法的人的53%。
这项大型研究表明,与奖赏、显著性、情感和默认模式处理相关的脑区灌注模式调节治疗反应,使舍曲林比安慰剂更具优势。将患者与确定的灌注模式准确匹配可显著提高缓解率。
美国国立精神卫生研究所、赫什基金会以及德克萨斯大学西南医学中心彼得·奥唐奈脑研究所的抑郁症研究与临床护理中心。试验注册:建立抑郁症临床护理抗抑郁药反应的调节因素和生物标志物(EMARC)注册号:NCT01407094(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01407094)。